kearly":3abns2p5 said:Edit: If my understanding is correct, Sowell won't cost Seattle a comp pick. As a then RFA, Sowell signed with AZ on a 1 year deal last February. Players who leave after signing a 1 year deal do not factor into the comp pick formula.
Willyeye":3abns2p5 said:One bad part about this signing: any signing of a UFA prior to June 1 cancels out one of our comp picks for 2017...as it stands right now, this signing cancels out our comp pick for Mebane. However, as long as we lose another UFA for at least $1.5 million, we can still regain the comp pick for Mebane. Hopefully, it will end up being someone like maybe one of the Jackson's...Tarvaris or Fred
This is a fair point to bring up, but requires further clarification. Not every UFA counts for or against comp picks, they have to reach a certain threshold of relevancy within the formula, which is based on some combination of salary, playing time, and postseason honors.
I'm guessing that Seattle signed Sowell before June 1st because they felt decently confident he wouldn't qualify. His pay and playing time are both on the low end, and he's never received awards. I doubt they view Sowell as being worth a 6th round pick.
It's my understanding that there has to be a minimum compensation threshold. For the higher picks, it's ranked by the size of the deal (among other things), but vet minimum guys don't apply towards the formula, as well as 1 year tenders.
If this was the case, everyone would be shuffling a couple dozen 7th round picks around the league for all the veteran minimum and 1 year tenders from all the different teams. Even if this was true, the Browns signed Bailey, which would cancel out Sowell. Unless we tender Michael for a year, but lose one of out ST guys. Yes, that's sarcasm, as the lower level player transactions would be even more impossible to keep track of than it is already.