Good stuff FidelisHawk...Here's some of my inputs...(in italics)
Bevell called “The Play”,
I agree, with a caveat, Pete knew it and okayed it.
I would agree with that. I too think Carroll okayed it and chose to fall on the sword when (sh)it hit the fan and the entire planet wanted an answer for what appeared to be a strange, high risk call.
“The Play” was a bad call,
I disagree, it’s been debated over and over and doing so again would take more time than this post needs. Let me just say, I believe, it was a good call with the worst possible outcome.
I would also agree. I wasn't one of the masses thinking it was a terrible call. It was in fact a great call that was executed terribly. Russell, Kearse and Lockette all played their roles in its ultimate failure. Butler knew the play was coming and he made the play of his career there.
“The Play” was such a bad call and handled so poorly, Bevell should’ve been fired.
I disagree, again I believe, it was a good call with the worst possible outcome. Could it have been handled differently sure, should he have been fired because of it, no. (now is he a subpar OC and should be fired, I’m neutral and have reasons that are both for and against, maybe another day).
Some would have been fired from that play call alone but with Carroll's loyalty firmly in hand that was never going to be a realistic outcome. Like stated above, the play call itself wasn't bad, the execution was.
“The Play” was called for nefarious reasons,
I disagree and don’t believe you think so either.
I definitely don't believe that either. Nothing nefarious. Bevell felt since everyone on the planet was expecting a hand off to Lynch, why not throw them a curve ball and do a quick slant to a backup receiver? Who would see THAT coming? Oh wait, don't answer that...
“The Play” split the locker room offense against defense,
I disagree, as I posted earlier if players a worried about a single play that happens two plays ago, two games ago or two years ago then they will never be able to play the game the way they should. That’s the premise I wholeheartedly dismiss and disagree with.
I do believe there has been a very real dichotomy between the offense and defense in recent years but I don't think it's genesis is tied to "The Play". My feeling is that the defense has held a bit of a grudge over the years for having to carry the offense, or for the offense not doing their job by moving the chains consistently and subsequently keeping them off the field and fresh. I've watched a lot of defensive players over the years in interviews and I can read body language pretty darn well and they pretty much admit it without spelling it out verbally.
“The Play” ended any chance for this team to be considered a dynasty,
I disagree, dynasties are determined after the fact, only history and/or popular opinion can, or will, make that determination, but continuing to win will go a long way in helping and I believe as long as Russell can play, this team can win.
It certainly did end any talk of a dynasty at that time. Had we won, we would have been the first NFL team in years to win back-to-back championships and no doubt the "D" word would have been part of the national conversation moving forward. We will have to win another Super Bowl and then win another within a year or two for that word to re-enter the conversation again. Of course, this would go for any team able to accomplish that. It's rare and why you never hear of dynasties these days where the QB isn't named Brady nor the coach named Belichick.
“The Play” will forever define the Carroll era,
I disagree, two lucky catches that cost two Super Bowls certainly didn’t define the Belichick era, winning games, getting there, and winning did. I believe Pete and this team have more wins ahead them contrary to the, seemingly, current popular opinion.
The media will always want to remind everyone of "The Play". Unfortunately, anytime the Seattle Seahawks meet with success or play in big games, that footage will likely be shown for the rest of our lives and our children's lives. But I agree that it won't ultimately be PC's "Story" here in Seattle. He's already done what no other Seahawks coach has been able to do and that's win a Super Bowl. Nothing can ever alter that narrative. Ever.
“The Play” was this team’s high water mark and their window is rapidly closing,
I disagree, call me an optimist if you must, but great teams have similar things in common. A good owner, check. A good front office, check. A good coach, check. A good quarterback, check.
You are right, the Seahawks still have a lot of key ingredients to sustain success over the long term. My comments on the window being all but closed is in reference to this particular roster, right now. The LOB is getting up there in age. It's rare for all 3 of them to be on the field for more than a 3 or 4 game stretch. So when I refer to the window almost closed, I am talking about the LOB Era, not the Seattle Seahawks moving forward and what they may look like in 2, 3 years from now. As long as Paul Allen is our owner and Russell Wilson is our Quarterback, I will always think we will be a competitive team in this league.
“The Play” will always be a dark cloud over everything they do from here on out,
I not only disagree, I’d hope nobody would ever pin their fandom on such a petty concept, but if you/they want to, okay, I choose to walk in the sunshine, after all, I’m an optimist.
It will only be a dark cloud as long as the team's collective subconscious allows it to be. Nothing will ever change the outcome of that game and the "what if's" of that game, but winning cures all in this league. I never was an Al Davis fan growing up but one thing he was always dead on was, "Just win baby."
Bevell called “The Play”,
I agree, with a caveat, Pete knew it and okayed it.
I would agree with that. I too think Carroll okayed it and chose to fall on the sword when (sh)it hit the fan and the entire planet wanted an answer for what appeared to be a strange, high risk call.
“The Play” was a bad call,
I disagree, it’s been debated over and over and doing so again would take more time than this post needs. Let me just say, I believe, it was a good call with the worst possible outcome.
I would also agree. I wasn't one of the masses thinking it was a terrible call. It was in fact a great call that was executed terribly. Russell, Kearse and Lockette all played their roles in its ultimate failure. Butler knew the play was coming and he made the play of his career there.
“The Play” was such a bad call and handled so poorly, Bevell should’ve been fired.
I disagree, again I believe, it was a good call with the worst possible outcome. Could it have been handled differently sure, should he have been fired because of it, no. (now is he a subpar OC and should be fired, I’m neutral and have reasons that are both for and against, maybe another day).
Some would have been fired from that play call alone but with Carroll's loyalty firmly in hand that was never going to be a realistic outcome. Like stated above, the play call itself wasn't bad, the execution was.
“The Play” was called for nefarious reasons,
I disagree and don’t believe you think so either.
I definitely don't believe that either. Nothing nefarious. Bevell felt since everyone on the planet was expecting a hand off to Lynch, why not throw them a curve ball and do a quick slant to a backup receiver? Who would see THAT coming? Oh wait, don't answer that...
“The Play” split the locker room offense against defense,
I disagree, as I posted earlier if players a worried about a single play that happens two plays ago, two games ago or two years ago then they will never be able to play the game the way they should. That’s the premise I wholeheartedly dismiss and disagree with.
I do believe there has been a very real dichotomy between the offense and defense in recent years but I don't think it's genesis is tied to "The Play". My feeling is that the defense has held a bit of a grudge over the years for having to carry the offense, or for the offense not doing their job by moving the chains consistently and subsequently keeping them off the field and fresh. I've watched a lot of defensive players over the years in interviews and I can read body language pretty darn well and they pretty much admit it without spelling it out verbally.
“The Play” ended any chance for this team to be considered a dynasty,
I disagree, dynasties are determined after the fact, only history and/or popular opinion can, or will, make that determination, but continuing to win will go a long way in helping and I believe as long as Russell can play, this team can win.
It certainly did end any talk of a dynasty at that time. Had we won, we would have been the first NFL team in years to win back-to-back championships and no doubt the "D" word would have been part of the national conversation moving forward. We will have to win another Super Bowl and then win another within a year or two for that word to re-enter the conversation again. Of course, this would go for any team able to accomplish that. It's rare and why you never hear of dynasties these days where the QB isn't named Brady nor the coach named Belichick.
“The Play” will forever define the Carroll era,
I disagree, two lucky catches that cost two Super Bowls certainly didn’t define the Belichick era, winning games, getting there, and winning did. I believe Pete and this team have more wins ahead them contrary to the, seemingly, current popular opinion.
The media will always want to remind everyone of "The Play". Unfortunately, anytime the Seattle Seahawks meet with success or play in big games, that footage will likely be shown for the rest of our lives and our children's lives. But I agree that it won't ultimately be PC's "Story" here in Seattle. He's already done what no other Seahawks coach has been able to do and that's win a Super Bowl. Nothing can ever alter that narrative. Ever.
“The Play” was this team’s high water mark and their window is rapidly closing,
I disagree, call me an optimist if you must, but great teams have similar things in common. A good owner, check. A good front office, check. A good coach, check. A good quarterback, check.
You are right, the Seahawks still have a lot of key ingredients to sustain success over the long term. My comments on the window being all but closed is in reference to this particular roster, right now. The LOB is getting up there in age. It's rare for all 3 of them to be on the field for more than a 3 or 4 game stretch. So when I refer to the window almost closed, I am talking about the LOB Era, not the Seattle Seahawks moving forward and what they may look like in 2, 3 years from now. As long as Paul Allen is our owner and Russell Wilson is our Quarterback, I will always think we will be a competitive team in this league.
“The Play” will always be a dark cloud over everything they do from here on out,
I not only disagree, I’d hope nobody would ever pin their fandom on such a petty concept, but if you/they want to, okay, I choose to walk in the sunshine, after all, I’m an optimist.
It will only be a dark cloud as long as the team's collective subconscious allows it to be. Nothing will ever change the outcome of that game and the "what if's" of that game, but winning cures all in this league. I never was an Al Davis fan growing up but one thing he was always dead on was, "Just win baby."