Sgt. Largent":15umsk50 said:Lynch? Eh, not there for me. Wilson for sure, probably Wagner by the time he's done, but not Lynch for me. Love me some Beastmode, but only five full years here isn't number retire worthy. If that's the case, we'd also have to retire Kam, Sherm, Cliff, Mikey B and Earl. Too many other in that SB era worthy list to just retire Lynch.
SoulfishHawk":31r7kt1x said:And disrespectful? Nah. The league has quite a few players who are wearing numbers of former greats. And you don't retire a number right away imo. Lynch played last season.
Rat":2w80vw7m said:If 37 isn't retired, 24 sure shouldn't be.
Sgt. Largent":2w80vw7m said:You retire numbers like 10-20 years after the player retires, not one year.
I also don't think Lynch is retire number worthy.
- Largent
- Jones
- Kennedy
- Easley
Lynch? Eh, not there for me. Wilson for sure, probably Wagner by the time he's done, but not Lynch for me. Love me some Beastmode, but only five full years here isn't number retire worthy. If that's the case, we'd also have to retire Kam, Sherm, Cliff, Mikey B and Earl. Too many other in that SB era worthy list to just retire Lynch.
SoulfishHawk":5k6fijvy said:I can't take any of this serious until they retire Kelly Jennings' #21
JustTheTip":j25qeiz7 said:Rat":j25qeiz7 said:If 37 isn't retired, 24 sure shouldn't be.
Thanks, needed a good laugh today.
Sgt. Largent":j25qeiz7 said:You retire numbers like 10-20 years after the player retires, not one year.
I also don't think Lynch is retire number worthy.
- Largent
- Jones
- Kennedy
- Easley
Lynch? Eh, not there for me. Wilson for sure, probably Wagner by the time he's done, but not Lynch for me. Love me some Beastmode, but only five full years here isn't number retire worthy. If that's the case, we'd also have to retire Kam, Sherm, Cliff, Mikey B and Earl. Too many other in that SB era worthy list to just retire Lynch.
+1, though I don't think Wilson is a for sure yet.
Sgt. Largent":2bcw7x0x said:JustTheTip":2bcw7x0x said:Rat":2bcw7x0x said:If 37 isn't retired, 24 sure shouldn't be.
Thanks, needed a good laugh today.
Sgt. Largent":2bcw7x0x said:You retire numbers like 10-20 years after the player retires, not one year.
I also don't think Lynch is retire number worthy.
- Largent
- Jones
- Kennedy
- Easley
Lynch? Eh, not there for me. Wilson for sure, probably Wagner by the time he's done, but not Lynch for me. Love me some Beastmode, but only five full years here isn't number retire worthy. If that's the case, we'd also have to retire Kam, Sherm, Cliff, Mikey B and Earl. Too many other in that SB era worthy list to just retire Lynch.
+1, though I don't think Wilson is a for sure yet.
Really, no Russell yet?
Dude's already on his way to the HOF, IMO he's already there........and certainly will be by the end of this contract.
TwistedHusky":lf9ldysi said:Retire #37?
Was there a great seahawk that wore #37?
You are not talking about the RB that was afraid of contact right?
The one that got a bunch of yards because he had 2 of the best OL in the league and one of the best EVER blocking for him?
Please tell me you are not trying to compare him to Marshawn?
TwistedHusky":3k7kl7nn said:Retire #37?
Was there a great seahawk that wore #37?
You are not talking about the RB that was afraid of contact right?
The one that got a bunch of yards because he had 2 of the best OL in the league and one of the best EVER blocking for him?
Please tell me you are not trying to compare him to Marshawn?