The Cutler's vs SC

[loafoftatupu]

Didn't Davis have an ankle injury? Any news on that?

 

[SF49r]

Didn't Davis have an ankle injury? Any news on that?

He got rolled up on after he caught a pass in the middle of the fourth and I didn't hear anything after that.

 

[lvnginhwktwn]

Looks like both our teams shit the bed today.

 

[RolandDeschain]

Looks like both our teams shit the bed today.

We collectively filled a sewage tanker, that's for sure. I'm just glad our loss was a road one to an AFC team, which might make a huge difference following the conclusion of week 17.

 

[ringless]

Didn't Davis have an ankle injury? Any news on that?

He got rolled up on after he caught a pass in the middle of the fourth and I didn't hear anything after that.

He was in crutches after the game

 

[SF49r]

Didn't Davis have an ankle injury? Any news on that?

He got rolled up on after he caught a pass in the middle of the fourth and I didn't hear anything after that.

He was in crutches after the game

Not going to be surprised if he has to miss games, the way he got rolled up was not pretty at all. As soon as it happened I knew he was hurt.

 

[TwilightError]

Ha ha! I prefer our way of losing. Its better to fight until the very end than crap the pants when on a huge lead.

 

[Timmahawk]

Looks like both our teams shit the bed today.

We collectively filled a sewage tanker, that's for sure. I'm just glad our loss was a road one to an AFC team, which might make a huge difference following the conclusion of week 17.

Isn't our loss worse for tiebreaker scenarios since the Chargers are a common opponent?

I do think it's a "better" loss, if that exists, since it was on the road.

 

[RolandDeschain]

Isn't our loss worse for tiebreaker scenarios since the Chargers are a common opponent?

I do think it's a "better" loss, if that exists, since it was on the road.

Crap, good point. You are correct. It goes division games, then common opponents, then conference games. The 49ers play the Chargers, but we don't play the Bears.

 

[Marvin49]

Welp good day for cardinals fans

I think back to the 2012 season, when the Cards started 4-0, had some possession of 1st for that week too.

In the end it will be SF/SEA regardless of the week 2 oddities. I could see losing to the Chargers, they balled out and kept the ball out of Seattle's hands. I couldn't see the Bears winning in SF though.

3



I think the niners didn't see it either. They played big headed. Sloppy and the stupid penalties sustained drives for the Bears. And gave them short field. Kapernick has not changed. He needs to be a game manager not a gun slinger. Now he is spitting racial cuss words and being penalized. Man what a Christian. This is not the same niners. They don't even have the same home anymore.

Ok, I was at the game so drove home and just now watched the game from start to finish...

...and I have no idea what you're talking about. There are no shots of his mouth to show what he said. He said after the game he didn't say anything and while I don't believe that completely I have no idea what you are referring to.

I'm not saying he didn't, but I have no idea why you say he did because I didn't see that at all. What did you see that I didn't?

As for the rest of the game....

1) Kap had a rough game but not as bad as I thought. Some dropsies my some players early and there were some pretty damn good defensive plays by the Bears. They were mistakes so not excusing them 100%, just not as bad as I thought.

2) Penalties were ridiculous. Some ticky tack calls and then some that DIDN'T get called... But it should never have even been that close. Can't put the loss on the refs.

3) Jimmie Ward had a rough night against Marshall. All 3 TDs were against Ward.


All in all....uuuggghhhh. Bad. Didn't look good in the second half. Can't give a team that many opportunities

 

[HawkWow]

Losing at home, after leading 17-0 is 1000x worse than our road loss.

True dat.

:lol: :lol:

When you're trying to win the "which loss was worst" fight, you've already lost.

Literally.

Nice.

 

[Popeyejones]

haha

:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

Oh, that hurts.

 

[Largent80]

Ummmmm.......9er's........[youtube]SKm5xQyD2vE[/youtube]

 

[theENGLISHseahawk]

The key issues for the 49ers as far as I can tell is a douche coach, an overrated quarterback and a defense littered with homophobes, wife beaters and weirdo's.

Apart from that everything is right on track.

 

[Sports Hernia]

The key issues for the 49ers as far as I can tell is a douche coach, an overrated quarterback and a defense littered with homophobes, wife beaters and weirdo's.

Apart from that everything is right on track.

That about sums it up.
Niner defense force spin in 3.......2.......1..........

 

[Popeyejones]

^^^^ :lol: . Nah.

Even Marvin doesn't bite hooks in water that shallow.

 

[homerun1970]

I think Marvin has a crimson and gold phone that goes off on any negative niner comments. The man is going to be exhausted at the rate Kaep is throwing picks.

 

[hawksfansinceday1]

Isn't our loss worse for tiebreaker scenarios since the Chargers are a common opponent?

I do think it's a "better" loss, if that exists, since it was on the road.

Crap, good point. You are correct. It goes division games, then common opponents, then conference games. The 49ers play the Chargers, but we don't play the Bears.

I think this is incorrect Ro. I think it's division games, then conference games then common opponents.

 

[hawk45]

Okay NFL.com sez:

To determine home-field priority among division-titlists, apply Wild Card tie-breakers

Wild Card tie-breakers then are:

Head-to-head, if applicable.
Best won-lost-tied percentage in games played within the conference.
Best won-lost-tied percentage in common games, minimum of four.

...so I think Day1 is correct, conference vs non-conference is more important for us. If I'm reading it all correctly.

http://www.nfl.com/standings/tiebreakingprocedures

 

[MizzouHawkGal]

Okay NFL.com sez:

To determine home-field priority among division-titlists, apply Wild Card tie-breakers

Wild Card tie-breakers then are:

Head-to-head, if applicable.
Best won-lost-tied percentage in games played within the conference.
Best won-lost-tied percentage in common games, minimum of four.

...so I think Day1 is correct, conference vs non-conference is more important for us. If I'm reading it all correctly.

http://www.nfl.com/standings/tiebreakingprocedures

Conference always takes precedence given that is where the majority of common opponents come from. AFC opponents are the last chance beyond point differential.