Largent80
New member
RolandDeschain":11088iw4 said:Largent80":11088iw4 said:Ha, we are easy to defend.
We should be one of the most unpredictable offenses around...And that doesn't mean gimmicky.
[youtube]2bz-Qet4BDM[/youtube]
RolandDeschain":11088iw4 said:Largent80":11088iw4 said:Ha, we are easy to defend.
We should be one of the most unpredictable offenses around...And that doesn't mean gimmicky.
I'll probably get lambasted for this, but I think that's due more to some good execution (I CAN FEEL THE HATRED, GUYS - STAHP!) on our part than anything else. Predictability on offense is a fairly consistent thing with us. You can be predictable on offense if you want, but it requires consistently great execution...Which is difficult, at best, to maintain in the NFL.austinslater25":20vfllag said:I would also add its only one game and we were a couple of horrible calls from scoring 40+ on Washington the game before.
DavidSeven":1cz062kg said:Anthony!":1cz062kg said:DavidSeven":1cz062kg said:When T-Jack plays, he throws short middle. Yes, part of our avoidance of that area is probably on coaching. But it's not all of it.
Ahh when did Tjack play enough to know that in the regular season? not a great point here
When T-Jack was the starter, our slot receiver was the most productive receiver on the team. In Wilson's rookie year, the slot player (Baldwin) disappeared. Even now, he only gets targeted when either playing outside or running a pattern to the outside.
Not to say T-Jack is more complete. That would be a ridiculous statement.
I get that you think RW is the biggest problem with the offense and maybe you're right but shit man, he threw some lasers on slants in XLVIII. He can and has made that throw. Re-watch it if you don't believe me.DavidSeven":124uhtqm said:Yes, we do throw slants, and we're terrible at them. Watching Russell's slant attempts last year was like getting your teeth pulled. Not sure why people are longing for them now. Short memories.
Nobody's perfect. The Ravens fired their OC between weeks 14 and 15 in 2012. They had some hiccups the next few games...Yet went on to win the Super Bowl.Scottemojo":3baiwkk7 said:Here is my problem with saying Bevell needs to go.
It means Pete is an idiot for hiring him. Or for not firing him. And Pete is not an idiot.
Scottemojo":wutebcnh said:Here is my problem with saying Bevell needs to go.
It means Pete is an idiot for hiring him. Or for not firing him. And Pete is not an idiot.
hawksfansinceday1":16c1309i said:I get that you think RW is the biggest problem with the offense and maybe you're right but shit man, he threw some lasers on slants in XLVIII. He can and has made that throw. Re-watch it if you don't believe me.DavidSeven":16c1309i said:Yes, we do throw slants, and we're terrible at them. Watching Russell's slant attempts last year was like getting your teeth pulled. Not sure why people are longing for them now. Short memories.
Fair enough. In my eyes it was certainly a team effort including Russ playing poorly.DavidSeven":1z2m63y8 said:.......... And again, some of that is also on scheming and our receivers.
If that meets your definitions of "logic" and "reason", well, frankly...I'm terrified. :shock: No decision could ever be right at the time but turn out to be wrong later, or vice-versa, yeah?...Sgt. Largent":1lxduy7a said:Scottemojo":1lxduy7a said:Here is my problem with saying Bevell needs to go.
It means Pete is an idiot for hiring him. Or for not firing him. And Pete is not an idiot.
You're using logic and reason, which have no place in this discussion.
You know what's funny? That was almost all the first half only of Green Bay, too. We became fairly vanilla in the second half, but it didn't matter. Almost all of the creativity was in the first half.Largent80":2l07nvty said:Get back to what we did vs. Green Bay, and keep doing it until someone figures out how to stop it.
RolandDeschain":txpkev5r said:If that meets your definitions of "logic" and "reason", well, frankly...I'm terrified. :shock: No decision could ever be right at the time but turn out to be wrong later, or vice-versa, yeah?...Sgt. Largent":txpkev5r said:Scottemojo":txpkev5r said:Here is my problem with saying Bevell needs to go.
It means Pete is an idiot for hiring him. Or for not firing him. And Pete is not an idiot.
You're using logic and reason, which have no place in this discussion.
I mean...Seriously? You're killin' me, Smalls.
XOXOLargent80":35sc6wt7 said:Well, there seems to be like 2 people that think Bevell is "above reproach", or it isn't his fault or, whatever. I haven't seen a single argument changing my mind so far.
Get back to what we did vs. Green Bay, and keep doing it until someone figures out how to stop it.
XOXO
Merlin Olson.
kearly":padyyfn5 said:He needs to get our offense back to being a controlling unit, and he also needs to start tailoring his game plan more to what opposing defenses give him. But I think if he makes those adjustments, offense will be the least of our worries this season.