bestfightstory":3g45xoge said:Imagine how great it would have been if we lost last week AND lost to the Niners AND even the Jags, but people made fun of us then we got all pissed off and won ALL the rest of our games AND the Super Bowl!!!
I think that might have been the best thing.
Cartire":hivssopw said:bestfightstory":hivssopw said:Imagine how great it would have been if we lost last week AND lost to the Niners AND even the Jags, but people made fun of us then we got all pissed off and won ALL the rest of our games AND the Super Bowl!!!
I think that might have been the best thing.
Im thinking doing what the Patriots couldnt do would be far more satisfying then proving people wrong after starting off 0-3.
therealjohncarlson":13bmikg1 said:oh god.... what a defeatist attitude....
we finally win our first road game of the season and people are upset we won...?
theseahawkguy":3pzjt7q1 said:They lost the first game? In recent memory the season of 2005 where the Hawks would have won the super bowl if it were not for the striped shirts, they lost the first game on the road to Jacksonville. Then last year losing at Arizona the first game of the year translated to an 11-5 season. Not sure how the 1984 Seattle Seahawks did on their first game but they did finish 12-4.
Or perhaps we can finally win the first four games and that proves to be the difference maker in winning it all?
Hoping this is the year we do it, go hawks!
jammerhawk":59akx6b2 said:Is this question for real? Answer, No!
As a past coach once said "You play the games to win!"
The Hawks won, should they be giving the W back to Carolina along with an excuse me? Are you freaking kidding?
Some people are over thinking. They won, I'm happy, next team up.
bestfightstory":2t0qlj12 said:THIS CANNOT BE OVERSTATED.
Nobody can come into Seahawks Stadium, in the postseason, and feel confident. It is a slaughterhouse.
We deserve to have that experience again.
There is no greater rush in sports, IMO. It's downright transcendental.
I want the number one seed. Which is why I go berserk after every single regular season loss. They ALL matter.
Popeyejones":1zg7scgp said:theseahawkguy":1zg7scgp said:Would the Hawks been better off if they lost the first game?
The NFL, like many sports leagues, uses a somewhat abstract organizational structure, in which teams are split into groups (called "conferences"), and then those groups are subdivided into smaller groups (called "divisions"). If a team makes the playoffs or not is based on 1) winning the most games in their division, and 2) if they do not win the most games in their division, winning the most games among teams in their conference who did not win the most games in their division.
Because of this extraordinarily high level of emphasis placed on the number of games a team has won in allocating playoff spots, teams are better off winning games than losing them, and should really go out of their way to try to win games whenever possible.
It can admittedly seem complicated at first, but over time the way the system is set up begins to feel more intuitive.
Hope this helps.
lukerguy":t6sntzdc said:No, but I feel like it's almost better for SF to have won their game vs GB. They couldn't start 0-2, so this gives them some compromise when they go 1-1