Geno can't handle pressure, plane and simple. Why do people tag him as "serviceable", because when Seattle plays the tougher Defenses he doesn't have the "it" factor to lead us to the win! His best game in the last 2 years was against Dallas, and still wasn't enough, granted the D didn't help that game. Seattle will never win in the playoffs with Geno under center.
Does our playcalling come into play at all against 'good defenses '?
How about the fact that our running game is near the bottom of the league?
Might that factor into us not beating 'good defenses'?
I mean, if your play caller isn't calling good plays ( and this isn't subjective analysis. Analysts and sports writers have referenced it) and can't scheme a ground game really at all... how does that affect qb play in your eyes?
Or is Geno only better than serviceable if he designs and calls his own plays and pulls a Michael Vick and just creates a running game on his own? Seems like that's where the goal posts have moved to now.
First it was - he can't play at all... 33 / 32. washed up, won't beat Lock.
Then it was he's good, but he can't get us to the playoffs.
Then it was 'ok, he's fine, but not clutch'
Now it's - ok, he's so clutch he's about to break an NFL record, but it doesnt count, because it's not against the elite teams in the league.
Got it.