Draft assessment

pittpnthrs

Well-known member
Joined
May 19, 2017
Messages
5,345
Reaction score
1,871
Seems like a lot of blame being placed on that 3rd receiver slot for the stalled offense instead of the true issue,,,a coaching staff that was unable to figure out how the beat a cover 2. That would have taken adaptation and ingenuity so I realize why it didnt happen.
 

Seattle Person

Well-known member
Joined
May 3, 2021
Messages
300
Reaction score
311
Can't this same logic be used for the oline then? You're placing a lot of blame on Pocic for the whole oline. I agree that a badass center is good but we can't say the same thing here? You're right that the staff was bad at game planning or adjustments. They didn't do any favors for any dude blocking either. We know we have guys that struggle in pass protection but yet we use still dial deep bombs and our QB runs away (sometimes for his life and sometimes just because....). We can't design a game plan to run away from Aaron Donald? Or not have Pocic block him. How many teams that won the Superbowl, you can name the C or G off the top of your head? We won with Carpenter, Unger, Sweezy as our crew....A lot of teams have won with average center and good everywhere else.

Whether it was Center or WR, I'm glad we went with someone on offense that can help this season. I truly believe D.E is going to do more 400 yds...He is probably going to have more impact on special teams (PR/KR/Gunner), he is going to be more of a factor with decoys, and he is a threat overall.

I agree that the front office should be pushed and challenged because they have done some weird crap over the years but if we gonna criticize, we need to give them kudos for the things they have done well. Last season's offseason was a shit show. No plan, no execution, they failed...This season has been a success outside of a #1 CB and C. Although Pocic is a starting caliber C. You can't say that they are not better set than last season. Maybe not SB favorites, but they should be fine. You make a valid point and that the front office needs to earn back some trust but you're just not making the points very well....
 

Maelstrom787

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 28, 2011
Messages
11,917
Reaction score
9,765
Location
Delaware
pittpnthrs":7nht72au said:
Maelstrom787":7nht72au said:
pittpnthrs":7nht72au said:
Maelstrom787":7nht72au said:
That said, he didn't put the kibosh on the whole thing, and Russell continued to pass his ass off.

Wonder how when the #3 receiver spot was so bad?

Speaking about frequency, not efficiency.

Perhaps the efficiency wouldn't have been horrible (for Russ standards) with a better tertiary option, hmm?

Russ has had other seasons with comparable attempts and numbers without some so called stud 3rd receiver. Hmmm.

Your points are contradicting yourself. If you honestly saw no problem with the offensive approach last season, then I see no reason for you to be upset with coaching.
 

toffee

Well-known member
Joined
Oct 9, 2016
Messages
10,619
Reaction score
6,781
Location
SoCal Desert
In our Superbowl years, we had Miller at TE, the the WR corp of Rice, Baldwin, Tate, Kearse.

We had an aging Olsen, a fresh from major rehab Dissly at TE, WR corp of Metcalf, Lockett, Moore.

So yes, we need your grade at TE and WRs. Pete and John has been trying to upgrade WR got years, then they found Metcalf. An inexpensive and complimentary 3rd and 4th Wars will make the system fly.

Sent from my IN2017 using Tapatalk
 

pittpnthrs

Well-known member
Joined
May 19, 2017
Messages
5,345
Reaction score
1,871
Seattle Person":1cvrz3l0 said:
Can't this same logic be used for the oline then? You're placing a lot of blame on Pocic for the whole oline. I agree that a badass center is good but we can't say the same thing here? You're right that the staff was bad at game planning or adjustments. They didn't do any favors for any dude blocking either. We know we have guys that struggle in pass protection but yet we use still dial deep bombs and our QB runs away (sometimes for his life and sometimes just because....). We can't design a game plan to run away from Aaron Donald? Or not have Pocic block him. How many teams that won the Superbowl, you can name the C or G off the top of your head? We won with Carpenter, Unger, Sweezy as our crew....A lot of teams have won with average center and good everywhere else.

Whether it was Center or WR, I'm glad we went with someone on offense that can help this season. I truly believe D.E is going to do more 400 yds...He is probably going to have more impact on special teams (PR/KR/Gunner), he is going to be more of a factor with decoys, and he is a threat overall.

I agree that the front office should be pushed and challenged because they have done some weird crap over the years but if we gonna criticize, we need to give them kudos for the things they have done well. Last season's offseason was a $h!t show. No plan, no execution, they failed...This season has been a success outside of a #1 CB and C. Although Pocic is a starting caliber C. You can't say that they are not better set than last season. Maybe not SB favorites, but they should be fine. You make a valid point and that the front office needs to earn back some trust but you're just not making the points very well....

Great post and I admit that I mumble up what i'm trying to say a good bit. Getting down to brass taxes, my feelings are as follows - Yes, i'm bitter they didnt take Creed when they could have. Is it possible that Creed could flop in the NFL? Sure, but the odds are he could have been the anchor at center for years to come. Chiefs were thrilled to take him. I believe Pocic is average to below average. Is he serviceable,,,,,I guess, but why settle for serviceable when a possible upgrade was there for the taking, at a position I think is pertinent on the offensive line. With the upgrade of Jackson and an upgraded center, the Oline would have finally been an area of no concern. Now, its just good enough. There's a glaring weak spot on the line and its Pocic.

I understand the Eskridge pick, but I just dont like it where it happened. I still think his numbers will fall in line with every other 3rd WR in the league. I guess they wanted an insurance policy if Metcalf and Lockette went down and I understand that also. Maybe he'll turn out to be some great punt returner (kickoff returners are irrelevant in todays NFL ever since the rule changes and almost every kicker blasts it 20 yards out of the endzone) and a gadget play wizard. Who knows. FO fell in love with him at the senior bowl so they took him. To me, its just another reach when other players were there that made more sense.

Honestly, I cant say if they are setup better than last season or not. They brought in a new OC that has never been an OC before. I dig bringing in somebody that appears to be creative and all, but some forget that he learned from a guy that the Hawks play twice a year in McShay. How unfamiliar can Waldron make the offense when it comes to playing the Rams? Time will tell I guess. Still concerned with the RBs. Carson will more than likely miss time as usual and that leaves Collins as the backup. While I like Collins, it appears Pete doesnt. Another wait and see. Not totally confident with the TE position either. Everett isnt great and I still feel he was signed more so for being Waldrons buddy rather than his talent. Still a slight upgrade probably. On defense, the Dunlap resigning was critical so i'm not so worried about the pass rush. The LBs and CB positions are shaky still at this point. Hopefully they can resign KJ but who knows. Ending all that, there's Pete Carroll. Watching the team with his philosophies, schemes, and tendencies has left me with zero confidence that he can take them any further than the second round in the post season regardless of who is on the roster. He has become more of a hindrance than a compliment at this point. He is to much for the team to overcome. God bless and kudos to him for delivering Seattle its first Super Bowl and creating that unbelievable team with hits like Lynch, Russ, and that incredible defense, but honestly, he had the inside track on the draft picks at the time and thats way behind him. The game has moved on and Pete isnt keeping pace.
 

pittpnthrs

Well-known member
Joined
May 19, 2017
Messages
5,345
Reaction score
1,871
Maelstrom787":1jzdzbm5 said:
pittpnthrs":1jzdzbm5 said:
Maelstrom787":1jzdzbm5 said:
pittpnthrs":1jzdzbm5 said:
Wonder how when the #3 receiver spot was so bad?

Speaking about frequency, not efficiency.

Perhaps the efficiency wouldn't have been horrible (for Russ standards) with a better tertiary option, hmm?

Russ has had other seasons with comparable attempts and numbers without some so called stud 3rd receiver. Hmmm.

Your points are contradicting yourself. If you honestly saw no problem with the offensive approach last season, then I see no reason for you to be upset with coaching.

Wasnt the offense on a historical pace of becoming the best offense in Seattles history before defenses implemented the cover 2? It was a coaching issue.
 

toffee

Well-known member
Joined
Oct 9, 2016
Messages
10,619
Reaction score
6,781
Location
SoCal Desert
In our Superbowl years, we had Miller at TE, WR corp of Rice, Baldwin, Tate, Kearse. Last season, we had an aging Olsen, and a fresh from major rehab Dissly at TE, WR corp of Metcalf, Lockette, Moore.

So yes, we need your grade at TE and WRs. Pete and John has been trying to upgrade WR got years, then they found Metcalf. An inexpensive and complimentary 3rd and 4th Wars will make the system fly.

Sent from my IN2017 using Tapatalk
 

Maelstrom787

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 28, 2011
Messages
11,917
Reaction score
9,765
Location
Delaware
pittpnthrs":2pvamktt said:
Seattle Person":2pvamktt said:
Can't this same logic be used for the oline then? You're placing a lot of blame on Pocic for the whole oline. I agree that a badass center is good but we can't say the same thing here? You're right that the staff was bad at game planning or adjustments. They didn't do any favors for any dude blocking either. We know we have guys that struggle in pass protection but yet we use still dial deep bombs and our QB runs away (sometimes for his life and sometimes just because....). We can't design a game plan to run away from Aaron Donald? Or not have Pocic block him. How many teams that won the Superbowl, you can name the C or G off the top of your head? We won with Carpenter, Unger, Sweezy as our crew....A lot of teams have won with average center and good everywhere else.

Whether it was Center or WR, I'm glad we went with someone on offense that can help this season. I truly believe D.E is going to do more 400 yds...He is probably going to have more impact on special teams (PR/KR/Gunner), he is going to be more of a factor with decoys, and he is a threat overall.

I agree that the front office should be pushed and challenged because they have done some weird crap over the years but if we gonna criticize, we need to give them kudos for the things they have done well. Last season's offseason was a $h!t show. No plan, no execution, they failed...This season has been a success outside of a #1 CB and C. Although Pocic is a starting caliber C. You can't say that they are not better set than last season. Maybe not SB favorites, but they should be fine. You make a valid point and that the front office needs to earn back some trust but you're just not making the points very well....

Great post and I admit that I mumble up what i'm trying to say a good bit. Getting down to brass taxes, my feelings are as follows - Yes, i'm bitter they didnt take Creed when they could have. Is it possible that Creed could flop in the NFL? Sure, but the odds are he could have been the anchor at center for years to come. Chiefs were thrilled to take him. I believe Pocic is average to below average. Is he serviceable,,,,,I guess, but why settle for serviceable when a possible upgrade was there for the taking, at a position I think is pertinent on the offensive line. With the upgrade of Jackson and an upgraded center, the Oline would have finally been an area of no concern. Now, its just good enough. There's a glaring weak spot on the line and its Pocic.

I understand the Eskridge pick, but I just dont like it where it happened. I still think his numbers will fall in line with every other 3rd WR in the league. I guess they wanted an insurance policy if Metcalf and Lockette went down and I understand that also. Maybe he'll turn out to be some great punt returner (kickoff returners are irrelevant in todays NFL ever since the rule changes and almost every kicker blasts it 20 yards out of the endzone) and a gadget play wizard. Who knows. FO fell in love with him at the senior bowl so they took him. To me, its just another reach when other players were there that made more sense.

Honestly, I cant say if they are setup better than last season or not. They brought in a new OC that has never been an OC before. I dig bringing in somebody that appears to be creative and all, but some forget that he learned from a guy that the Hawks play twice a year in McShay. How unfamiliar can Waldron make the offense when it comes to playing the Rams? Time will tell I guess. Still concerned with the RBs. Carson will more than likely miss time as usual and that leaves Collins as the backup. While I like Collins, it appears Pete doesnt. Another wait and see. Not totally confident with the TE position either. Everett isnt great and I still feel he was signed more so for being Waldrons buddy rather than his talent. Still a slight upgrade probably. On defense, the Dunlap resigning was critical so i'm not so worried about the pass rush. The LBs and CB positions are shaky still at this point. Hopefully they can resign KJ but who knows. Ending all that, there's Pete Carroll. Watching the team with his philosophies, schemes, and tendencies has left me with zero confidence that he can take them any further than the second round in the post season regardless of who is on the roster. He has become more of a hindrance than a compliment at this point. He is to much for the team to overcome. God bless and kudos to him for delivering Seattle its first Super Bowl and creating that unbelievable team with hits like Lynch, Russ, and that incredible defense, but honestly, he had the inside track on the draft picks at the time and thats way behind him. The game has moved on and Pete isnt keeping pace.

Alright. Animosity aside, I think we have a lot we agree on, just a few sticking points where we differ.

I agree that the team, following the philosophy of either 2018/2019 OR 2020, wasn't going to get anywhere in the playoffs. I'd have low faith in that too. I agree that center is the obvious weak point of the line, I just disagree on a personnel change being the best way to fix it, and I disagree about the Eskridge pick.

In the chats I was in at the time, believe it or not, I was sitting there saying "well, holy crap, he actually fell. they gotta go get him, go get creed, just write the name on the card and do it." Creed's a great prospect. I have to assume there was something I didn't see that NFL teams did for him to fall to 62, because he was my top center prospect in the entire draft behind Rashawn Slater, who I think would be better if he made the move.

When they picked Eskridge, I made the following tweet. I get where you're coming from, believe it or not.

[tweet]https://twitter.com/turbinsbicep/status/1388296457061556225[/tweet]

The reason I've come around is as follows:

1. WR, to me, was as big of a need, because I feel like the WR3 spot was weaker than OC1 when considering where the players are as it relates to replacement level. Pocic is slightly above replacement level talent-wise in my eyes, whereas Swain is likely below and behind him is a lot of practice squad quality. Furthermore, Lockett is injury prone, and the season would be on its last legs if he or DK went down for significant time.

2. Eskridge's profile is great. He's got sprinter speed, produced well, and brings something sorely needed when we consider the types of concepts that Waldron is likely to run. Pete, in a shocking reversal, actually came out and strongly said Russell is by far at his best when getting the ball out quickly. He also said Waldron keeps saying that having 3 solid targets is a necessity. They're focusing heavily on tempo. You know what that tells me? Zone rushing with jet motion added, and a lot of play action rollout.

Think 2018 Rams with Brandin Cooks. They had an amazing zone rushing attack partly because the threat of their jet sweeps picking up yardage froze defenders and spread them out. Brandin Cooks was a bona fide threat in that role, just like we saw Percy COULD be if he had his head on straight. No one on the Seahawks roster can do that. Swain doesn't have the plus athleticism, Lockett has lost his speed and lives and dies on his savvy, and DK is better as a traditional WR1 threat. A true weapon there opens up everything - not just in terms of traditional receiving, but opening up the run game and deeper targets.

3. I really think Pocic stands to improve greatly, and this isn't even because I believe in him, but because of where the offense is heading. The Rams made a solid center out of Austin Blythe, who is even more prone to getting blown back than Pocic is. Not only do we have Waldron, who played a big part in that, but we have Andy Dickerson now as the run game coordinator, who was assistant to Aaron Kromer in crafting that line.

Schottenheimer and Carroll ran a scheme that was hell on linemen. There wasn't any lateral movement, not much rolling out... basically, drop back and hope the line holds. The fact that the line DID hold for longer than they could in previous years even without the run game being used to help move the chains speaks well for the unit, and if Pocic was average in that offense, I think he can be above average (like he was at LSU) with another year at the spot, next to a much better guard, in a scheme that figures to take a lot of pressure off.

I think they'd have more trouble finding a legit threat at WR for those new offensive wrinkles than they would a center, and at the end of the day, I think they have more to gain from Eskridge than Creed after sitting back and combing through the hints about the direction of the offense.

As far as Carroll not changing, I'm optimistic that he will. 2020 was an entirely new direction, embracing Let Russ Cook. The wheels fell off, and I think they recognize that the way to fix it is by getting Russ rolling out, spreading out the defense with a legit zone run attack with jet sweep threats, and getting the ball out of his hands faster to targets that are schemed open more often. I think that's where the philosophical differences were between him and Schotty - Schotty wanted to stick with Let Russ Cook without having a viable plan to get the chains moving so the defense doesn't get killed, and Pete knew he needed something different.

I could be wrong. I've been wrong before and disappointed with Pete before, like in the 2018 WC vs. Dallas. But all the writing on the wall, to me, reads like he's looking for a new approach like he did in 2020.

PS: I also don't think it was a reach, just because the Rams obviously got screwed and ended up taking a worse prospect with the same type of skillset in Tutu Atwell directly after. But... that's just an educated guess.
 

pittpnthrs

Well-known member
Joined
May 19, 2017
Messages
5,345
Reaction score
1,871
Maelstrom787":26z1j55m said:
pittpnthrs":26z1j55m said:
Seattle Person":26z1j55m said:
Can't this same logic be used for the oline then? You're placing a lot of blame on Pocic for the whole oline. I agree that a badass center is good but we can't say the same thing here? You're right that the staff was bad at game planning or adjustments. They didn't do any favors for any dude blocking either. We know we have guys that struggle in pass protection but yet we use still dial deep bombs and our QB runs away (sometimes for his life and sometimes just because....). We can't design a game plan to run away from Aaron Donald? Or not have Pocic block him. How many teams that won the Superbowl, you can name the C or G off the top of your head? We won with Carpenter, Unger, Sweezy as our crew....A lot of teams have won with average center and good everywhere else.

Whether it was Center or WR, I'm glad we went with someone on offense that can help this season. I truly believe D.E is going to do more 400 yds...He is probably going to have more impact on special teams (PR/KR/Gunner), he is going to be more of a factor with decoys, and he is a threat overall.

I agree that the front office should be pushed and challenged because they have done some weird crap over the years but if we gonna criticize, we need to give them kudos for the things they have done well. Last season's offseason was a $h!t show. No plan, no execution, they failed...This season has been a success outside of a #1 CB and C. Although Pocic is a starting caliber C. You can't say that they are not better set than last season. Maybe not SB favorites, but they should be fine. You make a valid point and that the front office needs to earn back some trust but you're just not making the points very well....

Great post and I admit that I mumble up what i'm trying to say a good bit. Getting down to brass taxes, my feelings are as follows - Yes, i'm bitter they didnt take Creed when they could have. Is it possible that Creed could flop in the NFL? Sure, but the odds are he could have been the anchor at center for years to come. Chiefs were thrilled to take him. I believe Pocic is average to below average. Is he serviceable,,,,,I guess, but why settle for serviceable when a possible upgrade was there for the taking, at a position I think is pertinent on the offensive line. With the upgrade of Jackson and an upgraded center, the Oline would have finally been an area of no concern. Now, its just good enough. There's a glaring weak spot on the line and its Pocic.

I understand the Eskridge pick, but I just dont like it where it happened. I still think his numbers will fall in line with every other 3rd WR in the league. I guess they wanted an insurance policy if Metcalf and Lockette went down and I understand that also. Maybe he'll turn out to be some great punt returner (kickoff returners are irrelevant in todays NFL ever since the rule changes and almost every kicker blasts it 20 yards out of the endzone) and a gadget play wizard. Who knows. FO fell in love with him at the senior bowl so they took him. To me, its just another reach when other players were there that made more sense.

Honestly, I cant say if they are setup better than last season or not. They brought in a new OC that has never been an OC before. I dig bringing in somebody that appears to be creative and all, but some forget that he learned from a guy that the Hawks play twice a year in McShay. How unfamiliar can Waldron make the offense when it comes to playing the Rams? Time will tell I guess. Still concerned with the RBs. Carson will more than likely miss time as usual and that leaves Collins as the backup. While I like Collins, it appears Pete doesnt. Another wait and see. Not totally confident with the TE position either. Everett isnt great and I still feel he was signed more so for being Waldrons buddy rather than his talent. Still a slight upgrade probably. On defense, the Dunlap resigning was critical so i'm not so worried about the pass rush. The LBs and CB positions are shaky still at this point. Hopefully they can resign KJ but who knows. Ending all that, there's Pete Carroll. Watching the team with his philosophies, schemes, and tendencies has left me with zero confidence that he can take them any further than the second round in the post season regardless of who is on the roster. He has become more of a hindrance than a compliment at this point. He is to much for the team to overcome. God bless and kudos to him for delivering Seattle its first Super Bowl and creating that unbelievable team with hits like Lynch, Russ, and that incredible defense, but honestly, he had the inside track on the draft picks at the time and thats way behind him. The game has moved on and Pete isnt keeping pace.

Alright. Animosity aside, I think we have a lot we agree on, just a few sticking points where we differ.

I agree that the team, following the philosophy of either 2018/2019 OR 2020, wasn't going to get anywhere in the playoffs. I'd have low faith in that too. I agree that center is the obvious weak point of the line, I just disagree on a personnel change being the best way to fix it, and I disagree about the Eskridge pick.

In the chats I was in at the time, believe it or not, I was sitting there saying "well, holy crap, he actually fell. they gotta go get him, go get creed, just write the name on the card and do it." Creed's a great prospect. I have to assume there was something I didn't see that NFL teams did for him to fall to 62, because he was my top center prospect in the entire draft behind Rashawn Slater, who I think would be better if he made the move.

When they picked Eskridge, I made the following tweet. I get where you're coming from, believe it or not.

[tweet]https://twitter.com/turbinsbicep/status/1388296457061556225[/tweet]

The reason I've come around is as follows:

1. WR, to me, was as big of a need, because I feel like the WR3 spot was weaker than OC1 when considering where the players are as it relates to replacement level. Pocic is slightly above replacement level talent-wise in my eyes, whereas Swain is likely below and behind him is a lot of practice squad quality. Furthermore, Lockett is injury prone, and the season would be on its last legs if he or DK went down for significant time.

2. Eskridge's profile is great. He's got sprinter speed, produced well, and brings something sorely needed when we consider the types of concepts that Waldron is likely to run. Pete, in a shocking reversal, actually came out and strongly said Russell is by far at his best when getting the ball out quickly. He also said Waldron keeps saying that having 3 solid targets is a necessity. They're focusing heavily on tempo. You know what that tells me? Zone rushing with jet motion added, and a lot of play action rollout.

Think 2018 Rams with Brandin Cooks. They had an amazing zone rushing attack partly because the threat of their jet sweeps picking up yardage froze defenders and spread them out. Brandin Cooks was a bona fide threat in that role, just like we saw Percy COULD be if he had his head on straight. No one on the Seahawks roster can do that. Swain doesn't have the plus athleticism, Lockett has lost his speed and lives and dies on his savvy, and DK is better as a traditional WR1 threat. A true weapon there opens up everything - not just in terms of traditional receiving, but opening up the run game and deeper targets.

3. I really think Pocic stands to improve greatly, and this isn't even because I believe in him, but because of where the offense is heading. The Rams made a solid center out of Austin Blythe, who is even more prone to getting blown back than Pocic is. Not only do we have Waldron, who played a big part in that, but we have Andy Dickerson now as the run game coordinator, who was assistant to Aaron Kromer in crafting that line.

Schottenheimer and Carroll ran a scheme that was hell on linemen. There wasn't any lateral movement, not much rolling out... basically, drop back and hope the line holds. The fact that the line DID hold for longer than they could in previous years even without the run game being used to help move the chains speaks well for the unit, and if Pocic was average in that offense, I think he can be above average (like he was at LSU) with another year at the spot, next to a much better guard, in a scheme that figures to take a lot of pressure off.

I think they'd have more trouble finding a legit threat at WR for those new offensive wrinkles than they would a center, and at the end of the day, I think they have more to gain from Eskridge than Creed after sitting back and combing through the hints about the direction of the offense.

As far as Carroll not changing, I'm optimistic that he will. 2020 was an entirely new direction, embracing Let Russ Cook. The wheels fell off, and I think they recognize that the way to fix it is by getting Russ rolling out, spreading out the defense with a legit zone run attack with jet sweep threats, and getting the ball out of his hands faster to targets that are schemed open more often. I think that's where the philosophical differences were between him and Schotty - Schotty wanted to stick with Let Russ Cook without having a viable plan to get the chains moving so the defense doesn't get killed, and Pete knew he needed something different.

I could be wrong. I've been wrong before and disappointed with Pete before, like in the 2018 WC vs. Dallas. But all the writing on the wall, to me, reads like he's looking for a new approach like he did in 2020.

PS: I also don't think it was a reach, just because the Rams obviously got screwed and ended up taking a worse prospect with the same type of skillset in Tutu Atwell directly after. But... that's just an educated guess.

Great post Maelstrom and all valid points. Rolling Russ out would be neat wouldnt it? Hope that starts to actually happen. Maybe Pocic will come into his own with a different scheme and solid players beside him, but like you, I just wish we had a player that didnt have to depend on that. Eskridge seems to be solid and I hope he comes out balling like nobody else and makes me look like a fool (probably will). I would gladly take that. The only part of your post I differ with is the Pete Carroll part. While you are optimistic that he can change, i'm convinced he cant. Again, I hope i'm wrong.

We obviously see things through different lenses, but at the end of it all, we both want the same thing and thats for the team to be successful. Peace to you brother.
 

Ad Hawk

Well-known member
Joined
Sep 6, 2011
Messages
3,203
Reaction score
429
pittpnthrs":1gcpm902 said:
Great post Maelstrom and all valid points. Rolling Russ out would be neat wouldnt it? Hope that starts to actually happen. Maybe Pocic will come into his own with a different scheme and solid players beside him, but like you, I just wish we had a player that didnt have to depend on that. Eskridge seems to be solid and I hope he comes out balling like nobody else and makes me look like a fool (probably will). I would gladly take that. The only part of your post I differ with is the Pete Carroll part. While you are optimistic that he can change, i'm convinced he cant. Again, I hope i'm wrong.

We obviously see things through different lenses, but at the end of it all, we both want the same thing and thats for the team to be successful. Peace to you brother.

Fantastic contributions here and above. Thanks for the realism peppered with hope.
 

oldhawkfan

Well-known member
Joined
Dec 3, 2011
Messages
4,156
Reaction score
1,549
Location
Spokane
Nunya":1x49aye4 said:
pittpnthrs":1x49aye4 said:
Nunya":1x49aye4 said:
No, that is NOT something we can all agree on. The fact that you even made that comment does nothing more than to expose your own depressing pessimistic viewpoint and lack of logical thinking. You seem to not quite grasp how hard it is for a team to reach the SB, let alone win it. The Seahawks have been a competitive team for almost every season since Carroll has been coach and there is nothing to indicate that they will not be this season as well. ANY team that makes the play-offs has just as good of a chance to make the SB as any other team. The fact that there are some teams that do great in regular season, only to get quickly knocked out of the play-offs normally has little to do with coaching. There are many other factors that more often contribute that have nothing to do with coaching.

Your out of touch if your being that optimistic. I'm not suggesting a Super Bowl appearance every season, but there has to be signs of improvement at some point for people to think like you. Its been 6 years now and the team can barely get out of the 1st round. Its a Pete Carroll issue. He is a bad gameday coach and gets outcoached horribly in the post season. There was no better example than last year against the Rams. He openly admitted that he didnt understand how his gameplan didnt work although it was the same exact gameplan he used just 2 weeks prior. Thats downright embarrassing. McVay had no issue changing his gameplan thus winning with a 4 fingered QB and his best defensive player playing at about 50%. So that is what the team has to overcome along with the actual opponent on the other side. Sorry, I cant get optimistic about that. Especially when Carroll is actually getting worse.

Speaking of out of touch, that post was about as out of touch to the realism of football as one can get.

I agree to extent that a team's goal should be to improve, but not in the sense you describe. There are 12 teams that have never won the SB, and 4 teams that have never even been to the SB. That is how competitive it is. There likely isn't anybody that is involved in Professional football that would agree with your assessment that PC is a bad game day coach.....and his record proves that is not the case. And anybody that believes a professional coach can be a great regular season coach but a poor playoff coach doesn't know their arse from a banjo when it comes to football. Sorry, but your viewpoint is misguided and unrealistic.


^^^this exactly! If we are to believe Pitt, then Pete can’t coach and they also can’t draft. If those two things are true, then it’s a damn miracle that this team is a perennial playoff team. Or Russell Wilson is the most important QB to have ever played the game.
 

Maelstrom787

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 28, 2011
Messages
11,917
Reaction score
9,765
Location
Delaware
pittpnthrs":3kftzsua said:
Maelstrom787":3kftzsua said:
pittpnthrs":3kftzsua said:
Seattle Person":3kftzsua said:
Can't this same logic be used for the oline then? You're placing a lot of blame on Pocic for the whole oline. I agree that a badass center is good but we can't say the same thing here? You're right that the staff was bad at game planning or adjustments. They didn't do any favors for any dude blocking either. We know we have guys that struggle in pass protection but yet we use still dial deep bombs and our QB runs away (sometimes for his life and sometimes just because....). We can't design a game plan to run away from Aaron Donald? Or not have Pocic block him. How many teams that won the Superbowl, you can name the C or G off the top of your head? We won with Carpenter, Unger, Sweezy as our crew....A lot of teams have won with average center and good everywhere else.

Whether it was Center or WR, I'm glad we went with someone on offense that can help this season. I truly believe D.E is going to do more 400 yds...He is probably going to have more impact on special teams (PR/KR/Gunner), he is going to be more of a factor with decoys, and he is a threat overall.

I agree that the front office should be pushed and challenged because they have done some weird crap over the years but if we gonna criticize, we need to give them kudos for the things they have done well. Last season's offseason was a $h!t show. No plan, no execution, they failed...This season has been a success outside of a #1 CB and C. Although Pocic is a starting caliber C. You can't say that they are not better set than last season. Maybe not SB favorites, but they should be fine. You make a valid point and that the front office needs to earn back some trust but you're just not making the points very well....

Great post and I admit that I mumble up what i'm trying to say a good bit. Getting down to brass taxes, my feelings are as follows - Yes, i'm bitter they didnt take Creed when they could have. Is it possible that Creed could flop in the NFL? Sure, but the odds are he could have been the anchor at center for years to come. Chiefs were thrilled to take him. I believe Pocic is average to below average. Is he serviceable,,,,,I guess, but why settle for serviceable when a possible upgrade was there for the taking, at a position I think is pertinent on the offensive line. With the upgrade of Jackson and an upgraded center, the Oline would have finally been an area of no concern. Now, its just good enough. There's a glaring weak spot on the line and its Pocic.

I understand the Eskridge pick, but I just dont like it where it happened. I still think his numbers will fall in line with every other 3rd WR in the league. I guess they wanted an insurance policy if Metcalf and Lockette went down and I understand that also. Maybe he'll turn out to be some great punt returner (kickoff returners are irrelevant in todays NFL ever since the rule changes and almost every kicker blasts it 20 yards out of the endzone) and a gadget play wizard. Who knows. FO fell in love with him at the senior bowl so they took him. To me, its just another reach when other players were there that made more sense.

Honestly, I cant say if they are setup better than last season or not. They brought in a new OC that has never been an OC before. I dig bringing in somebody that appears to be creative and all, but some forget that he learned from a guy that the Hawks play twice a year in McShay. How unfamiliar can Waldron make the offense when it comes to playing the Rams? Time will tell I guess. Still concerned with the RBs. Carson will more than likely miss time as usual and that leaves Collins as the backup. While I like Collins, it appears Pete doesnt. Another wait and see. Not totally confident with the TE position either. Everett isnt great and I still feel he was signed more so for being Waldrons buddy rather than his talent. Still a slight upgrade probably. On defense, the Dunlap resigning was critical so i'm not so worried about the pass rush. The LBs and CB positions are shaky still at this point. Hopefully they can resign KJ but who knows. Ending all that, there's Pete Carroll. Watching the team with his philosophies, schemes, and tendencies has left me with zero confidence that he can take them any further than the second round in the post season regardless of who is on the roster. He has become more of a hindrance than a compliment at this point. He is to much for the team to overcome. God bless and kudos to him for delivering Seattle its first Super Bowl and creating that unbelievable team with hits like Lynch, Russ, and that incredible defense, but honestly, he had the inside track on the draft picks at the time and thats way behind him. The game has moved on and Pete isnt keeping pace.

Alright. Animosity aside, I think we have a lot we agree on, just a few sticking points where we differ.

I agree that the team, following the philosophy of either 2018/2019 OR 2020, wasn't going to get anywhere in the playoffs. I'd have low faith in that too. I agree that center is the obvious weak point of the line, I just disagree on a personnel change being the best way to fix it, and I disagree about the Eskridge pick.

In the chats I was in at the time, believe it or not, I was sitting there saying "well, holy crap, he actually fell. they gotta go get him, go get creed, just write the name on the card and do it." Creed's a great prospect. I have to assume there was something I didn't see that NFL teams did for him to fall to 62, because he was my top center prospect in the entire draft behind Rashawn Slater, who I think would be better if he made the move.

When they picked Eskridge, I made the following tweet. I get where you're coming from, believe it or not.

[tweet]https://twitter.com/turbinsbicep/status/1388296457061556225[/tweet]

The reason I've come around is as follows:

1. WR, to me, was as big of a need, because I feel like the WR3 spot was weaker than OC1 when considering where the players are as it relates to replacement level. Pocic is slightly above replacement level talent-wise in my eyes, whereas Swain is likely below and behind him is a lot of practice squad quality. Furthermore, Lockett is injury prone, and the season would be on its last legs if he or DK went down for significant time.

2. Eskridge's profile is great. He's got sprinter speed, produced well, and brings something sorely needed when we consider the types of concepts that Waldron is likely to run. Pete, in a shocking reversal, actually came out and strongly said Russell is by far at his best when getting the ball out quickly. He also said Waldron keeps saying that having 3 solid targets is a necessity. They're focusing heavily on tempo. You know what that tells me? Zone rushing with jet motion added, and a lot of play action rollout.

Think 2018 Rams with Brandin Cooks. They had an amazing zone rushing attack partly because the threat of their jet sweeps picking up yardage froze defenders and spread them out. Brandin Cooks was a bona fide threat in that role, just like we saw Percy COULD be if he had his head on straight. No one on the Seahawks roster can do that. Swain doesn't have the plus athleticism, Lockett has lost his speed and lives and dies on his savvy, and DK is better as a traditional WR1 threat. A true weapon there opens up everything - not just in terms of traditional receiving, but opening up the run game and deeper targets.

3. I really think Pocic stands to improve greatly, and this isn't even because I believe in him, but because of where the offense is heading. The Rams made a solid center out of Austin Blythe, who is even more prone to getting blown back than Pocic is. Not only do we have Waldron, who played a big part in that, but we have Andy Dickerson now as the run game coordinator, who was assistant to Aaron Kromer in crafting that line.

Schottenheimer and Carroll ran a scheme that was hell on linemen. There wasn't any lateral movement, not much rolling out... basically, drop back and hope the line holds. The fact that the line DID hold for longer than they could in previous years even without the run game being used to help move the chains speaks well for the unit, and if Pocic was average in that offense, I think he can be above average (like he was at LSU) with another year at the spot, next to a much better guard, in a scheme that figures to take a lot of pressure off.

I think they'd have more trouble finding a legit threat at WR for those new offensive wrinkles than they would a center, and at the end of the day, I think they have more to gain from Eskridge than Creed after sitting back and combing through the hints about the direction of the offense.

As far as Carroll not changing, I'm optimistic that he will. 2020 was an entirely new direction, embracing Let Russ Cook. The wheels fell off, and I think they recognize that the way to fix it is by getting Russ rolling out, spreading out the defense with a legit zone run attack with jet sweep threats, and getting the ball out of his hands faster to targets that are schemed open more often. I think that's where the philosophical differences were between him and Schotty - Schotty wanted to stick with Let Russ Cook without having a viable plan to get the chains moving so the defense doesn't get killed, and Pete knew he needed something different.

I could be wrong. I've been wrong before and disappointed with Pete before, like in the 2018 WC vs. Dallas. But all the writing on the wall, to me, reads like he's looking for a new approach like he did in 2020.

PS: I also don't think it was a reach, just because the Rams obviously got screwed and ended up taking a worse prospect with the same type of skillset in Tutu Atwell directly after. But... that's just an educated guess.

Great post Maelstrom and all valid points. Rolling Russ out would be neat wouldnt it? Hope that starts to actually happen. Maybe Pocic will come into his own with a different scheme and solid players beside him, but like you, I just wish we had a player that didnt have to depend on that. Eskridge seems to be solid and I hope he comes out balling like nobody else and makes me look like a fool (probably will). I would gladly take that. The only part of your post I differ with is the Pete Carroll part. While you are optimistic that he can change, i'm convinced he cant. Again, I hope i'm wrong.

We obviously see things through different lenses, but at the end of it all, we both want the same thing and thats for the team to be successful. Peace to you brother.

Cheers, brother. I think the string of disappointing exits is what has everyone so passionate. Winning will fix all, hopefully they put it together this year.
 

pittpnthrs

Well-known member
Joined
May 19, 2017
Messages
5,345
Reaction score
1,871
oldhawkfan":3jhonn76 said:
Nunya":3jhonn76 said:
pittpnthrs":3jhonn76 said:
Nunya":3jhonn76 said:
No, that is NOT something we can all agree on. The fact that you even made that comment does nothing more than to expose your own depressing pessimistic viewpoint and lack of logical thinking. You seem to not quite grasp how hard it is for a team to reach the SB, let alone win it. The Seahawks have been a competitive team for almost every season since Carroll has been coach and there is nothing to indicate that they will not be this season as well. ANY team that makes the play-offs has just as good of a chance to make the SB as any other team. The fact that there are some teams that do great in regular season, only to get quickly knocked out of the play-offs normally has little to do with coaching. There are many other factors that more often contribute that have nothing to do with coaching.

Your out of touch if your being that optimistic. I'm not suggesting a Super Bowl appearance every season, but there has to be signs of improvement at some point for people to think like you. Its been 6 years now and the team can barely get out of the 1st round. Its a Pete Carroll issue. He is a bad gameday coach and gets outcoached horribly in the post season. There was no better example than last year against the Rams. He openly admitted that he didnt understand how his gameplan didnt work although it was the same exact gameplan he used just 2 weeks prior. Thats downright embarrassing. McVay had no issue changing his gameplan thus winning with a 4 fingered QB and his best defensive player playing at about 50%. So that is what the team has to overcome along with the actual opponent on the other side. Sorry, I cant get optimistic about that. Especially when Carroll is actually getting worse.

Speaking of out of touch, that post was about as out of touch to the realism of football as one can get.

I agree to extent that a team's goal should be to improve, but not in the sense you describe. There are 12 teams that have never won the SB, and 4 teams that have never even been to the SB. That is how competitive it is. There likely isn't anybody that is involved in Professional football that would agree with your assessment that PC is a bad game day coach.....and his record proves that is not the case. And anybody that believes a professional coach can be a great regular season coach but a poor playoff coach doesn't know their arse from a banjo when it comes to football. Sorry, but your viewpoint is misguided and unrealistic.


^^^this exactly! If we are to believe Pitt, then Pete can’t coach and they also can’t draft. If those two things are true, then it’s a damn miracle that this team is a perennial playoff team. Or Russell Wilson is the most important QB to have ever played the game.

Do you even watch this team? How many times has Russell Wilson pulled this clubs fat out of the fryer in the 4th quarter by throwing the play book out the window and putting on his magic show? How many times has the team run the same predictable and stale offense thus taking entire quarters and even halfs off? How many times have you watched and said 'What is he doing?' when it comes to Petes play calls, calling timeouts, throwing the replay flag, or clock management (if none, you shouldnt even be in this conversation). How many times in after game pressers has been admitted to being clueless as to why his gameplan didnt work instead of changing it to something that would (this is getting worse)?

Since 2014, how do you feel the FO has done drafting? It hasent been great.

Look up how many 4th quarter comebacks Wilson has since he came into this league. Its possible he very well might be the most important QB to ever play for their club when you sit and think about it.
 

Jville

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 3, 2007
Messages
13,266
Reaction score
1,650
It's my understanding that the 2021 draft, as an anomaly, is expected to be among the worst in NFL history. So trading out of the 2021 draft and tapping into other avenues of talent acquisition should eventually enjoy the two thumbs up credit it deserves.
 

Jerhawk

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 22, 2010
Messages
6,242
Reaction score
3,082
Location
Spokane, WA
This thread has been a great read. Thank you pittpnthrs, Maelstrom787 and others.

As you can see from Pittpnthrs' signature I got a bit excited when we took Eskridge.
A #3 reliable receiver will be vital to the team's success. That's why they were trying to be so patient with Gordon and Russ kept trying to get AB.

Eskridge could be the next AB. He could be the next Deon Butler. Hopefully not the latter.

I agree with Pittpnthrs about Carroll's stubbornness and unwillingness to change. But, I think the hiring of Waldron should go to show that he's willing to change. I just hope he keeps his hands out the cookie jar. Keep him away from the offense and focus on the defense imo.
 

Seattle Person

Well-known member
Joined
May 3, 2021
Messages
300
Reaction score
311
Great points all around. I enjoyed the debate and discussion. The more and more I look into Eskridge, I think I like his makeup and build a little more. Although, he's 190, he is built pretty thick. This suggest to me he likes to play physical. I'm not really seeing Tyler Lockett anymore or Doug Baldwin. I'm seeing a faster, slightly smaller Robert Woods. Bob Tree is physical but not the biggest and he is so versatile. A lot of Seahawk fans were naturally comparing D.E to our players but may Waldron is seeing Woods?

Check this video out and tell me if he's built like Tyler? Looks a little stockier than I thought...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fFfP7SmUf_c
 
Top