Maybe there was no trading partnerPosition of Need: A+
Quality of Player: A+
Value for Pick 18: B
No real complaints other than we might have been able to trade down a bit if that was our target.
Maybe there was no trading partnerPosition of Need: A+
Quality of Player: A+
Value for Pick 18: B
No real complaints other than we might have been able to trade down a bit if that was our target.
That is an issue at the mid and bottom first round - the variance in draft grades. No complaints here and I rarely let a chance to bash JS go by.His stock was all over the place lately; it was hard to get a real handle on where he could go. If they really wanted him, they were right to not risk losing him on the trade down. I personally was getting the impression he was slipping, but other places were saying he could go as high as the fringes of the top 10. Who knows? Just takes one team.
It highly depends on how many cocktails I had before trying.You've obviously never had the pleasure(?) of a reach-around. lol
Took you a few minutes to react, I see. Getting cleaned up?ECSTATIC! Was so worried we were going to get sniped!
LFG!
Does he have any nicknames? His name is unique enough to not need one, but also unique enough where people have probably made many for him. As a recovering alcoholic, it probably isn't good that "Grey Goose" immediately came to mind lol.
Being versatile is our new boy's strength.I don’t hate it.. but I’m mixed on it. Maybe because I’m past yrs when I’ve heard about us having olinemen who moves around around to different positions.. they’re always subpar. So maybe what they explained about him just has me kinda meh
He grew on me. Some of the Creed Humphreys comparisons started making sense.I am usually more complimentary of our picks than the average poster, but I dislike this one. Love going OL, but I see too much with Zabel that I just don't see translating immediately. Feels like a player who should've been taken 50 instead of 18 to me.
Again, love addressing the OL, but I don't like the player selected here compared to the value of the pick.
I am usually more complimentary of our picks than the average poster, but I dislike this one. Love going OL, but I see too much with Zabel that I just don't see translating immediately. Feels like a player who should've been taken 50 instead of 18 to me.
Again, love addressing the OL, but I don't like the player selected here compared to the value of the pick.
Pre draft I was thinking 18 was high for Zabel but most draft boards has him and Booker is a similar place, with Booker going at 12 and the top tier OTs gone (I fancied us getting Banks at 18 with potential to play guard) if we traded down and Zabel went we would be struggling to give our O-line the improvement it needsPosition of Need: A+
Quality of Player: A+
Value for Pick 18: B
No real complaints other than we might have been able to trade down a bit if that was our target.
What would you have done? Tough to trade down when there isn't that blue chip guy who slid dangling there still on the board. Sounds like they tried.I am usually more complimentary of our picks than the average poster, but I dislike this one. Love going OL, but I see too much with Zabel that I just don't see translating immediately. Feels like a player who should've been taken 50 instead of 18 to me.
Again, love addressing the OL, but I don't like the player selected here compared to the value of the pick.
I can see it with the athleticism, but I think a few things work against Zabel. The anchor is lacking, he got worked vs. Colorado, and he's been bad with penalties in the past.He grew on me. Some of the Creed Humphreys comparisons started making sense.
I am usually more complimentary of our picks than the average poster, but I dislike this one. Love going OL, but I see too much with Zabel that I just don't see translating immediately. Feels like a player who should've been taken 50 instead of 18 to me.
Again, love addressing the OL, but I don't like the player selected here compared to the value of the pick.