I wouldn't put it that way because I don't think you can group offensive line positions together. Taking a LT early is very on brand as that's what we have drafted both times this FO has been in position to get a top prospect. We also traded draft picks one year in exchange for a pro bowl LT when we were drafting later and couldn't get a top prospect.
Our investment tier has been LT >> RT > C > OG historically. That might be changing because the Rams have made do with cheaper, small athletic centers and we got an ex-Rams center with our first center acquisition after the transition to their offense. Of course center is also a big need right now so anything is on the table really and nothing should be too much of a surprise.
I can see your point, but even under the terms you've laid out, we haven't spent draft capital on the OL like we have with other positions.
I'd have to go back and look for it, but I once did a little research on our drafting priorities, which round we took certain positions at over the past 6-7 years or so, weighted them by the round we took them in to get an average. OL, including tackles, was way down the list. That was before the 2022 draft, which seems to have represented a change in priorities, or at least I hope so.
Additionally, in the past we seemed to have considered the interior line positions as a haven for busted tackles. Ifedi, Britt, and Carpenter were all moved inside when they weren't cutting it at tackle. Hopefully, we've changed our philosophy.