Largent80":gni7bihu said:
Ramfan128":gni7bihu said:
seahawksny":gni7bihu said:
Ram fans I'm sure have just as much, if not more worry, because of our 6-0 road record
Nah the 6-0 on the road doesn't bother me. Hell, this will be much less of a road game than any other game the Hawks have played this year - between LA fans not showing up and some Seattle fans making the trip.
The only reason I'm worried is because we have no safety net - one more loss and the season is over. That and Russell Wilson.
He is the ultimate equalizer, but I still just think the Rams are more talented than Seattle. And even with what happened two weeks ago against the Ravens, this is the best run defense we've had under McVay. We also have the most sacks in the NFL since we acquired Ramsey.
Posts like this are hilarious. Trying to downplay a perfect road record at this stage of the season is foolish at best. Especially since 4 of those wins are 10:00 a.m. Eastern time starts with one being flexed out of prime time.
This Seahawks team is much better defensively than the Thursday night game and they have confidence. Ansah barely played, Reed was OUT, and Clowney was all the Hawks had on the D-Line. We had Tedric friggin Thompson at FS, now we have Diggs who has elevated the play of McDougald, also the LB's are playing to their potential....As I said before if the wittle wambs can't execute screens or quick slants they are simply toast.
Nowhere did I downplay the perfect road record? It just doesn't worry me.
Seattle has a better road record than home record, but I doubt any team would say "you know, I'd rather play in Seattle" - you guys may not be as loud as you used to be, but it's still a top 5 home field advantage in the NFL.
This game is probably a toss up - but I don't think it has anything to do with Seattle playing well on the road.
It has to do with Russell Wilson.And "wittle wambs" is a little over the top.