cymatica":1byp7kkx said:Bevell looks for a rhythm to the offense and adjusts all the time
I didn't notice any screen passes(2nd and 20 doesnt count), misdirections, crossing routes to counter blitzing. Didnt see and TE chips to help the OL until way late in the game. Didnt notice rhythm either when we finally drive at the end, only to kill any rhythm with a 1st down run to collins after shredding them with passes on the last drive, and never establishing the run. Who calls back to back screen passes on 2nd and 3rd with 20 yds to go?
I disagree. The long pass to Kearse down the left sideline was a great situational play call.NFSeahawks628":31vl7ug5 said:Siouxhawk":31vl7ug5 said:Bevell looks for a rhythm to the offense and adjusts all the time. PRichs catch for a first down early in the second half is an example. Beating the blitz in OT on the big pass play to Kearse is another.
The real reason our offense struggled is because our line regressed against a formidable defense. Pure and simple. Too many whiffs against the DE and costly penalties took the wind out of our sails. Still, we had a chance to win.
Looks for rhythm? He must still be looking.
The fade route to Kearse was a credit to RW's throw, not his play calling. A fade route on 3rd and four is a very low percentage play call. Silly to call it in that situation.
The inside of the offensive line played well, it's our tackles where we had problems, but once again this can be countered by calling quick throws from the pocket. Which he doesn't do. It would also be wise to use Graham as a decoy to allow Baldwin to get open in the flat for easy yards.
It's a coaching problem. Coaching is about critically thinking and being able to adjust on the fly, Bevell can't.
cymatica":2bll7v67 said:Bevell looks for a rhythm to the offense and adjusts all the time
I didn't notice any screen passes(2nd and 20 doesnt count), misdirections, crossing routes to counter blitzing. Didnt see and TE chips to help the OL until way late in the game. Didnt notice rhythm either when we finally drive at the end, only to kill any rhythm with a 1st down run to collins after shredding them with passes on the last drive, and never establishing the run. Who calls back to back screen passes on 2nd and 3rd with 20 yds to go?
Cyrus12":1fycbbjm said:Bevell is awesome...look how many head coaching jobs he paased up over these last few years....
Siouxhawk":2nppbw6h said:I disagree. The long pass to Kearse down the left sideline was a great situational play call.NFSeahawks628":2nppbw6h said:Siouxhawk":2nppbw6h said:Bevell looks for a rhythm to the offense and adjusts all the time. PRichs catch for a first down early in the second half is an example. Beating the blitz in OT on the big pass play to Kearse is another.
The real reason our offense struggled is because our line regressed against a formidable defense. Pure and simple. Too many whiffs against the DE and costly penalties took the wind out of our sails. Still, we had a chance to win.
Looks for rhythm? He must still be looking.
The fade route to Kearse was a credit to RW's throw, not his play calling. A fade route on 3rd and four is a very low percentage play call. Silly to call it in that situation.
The inside of the offensive line played well, it's our tackles where we had problems, but once again this can be countered by calling quick throws from the pocket. Which he doesn't do. It would also be wise to use Graham as a decoy to allow Baldwin to get open in the flat for easy yards.
It's a coaching problem. Coaching is about critically thinking and being able to adjust on the fly, Bevell can't.
The rhythm was found in overtime and should have amounted to a win.
It's no secret that our coaching staff is trying to keep Russ out of harm's way and want him operating in the pocket. That requires good protection from our line. But they didn't have it Sunday and that was a problem.
cymatica":1kxm43vx said:Again, why not help the o-line with TE or RB chipping the ends. Didnt see that all game. Thats on coaching to recognize that
Actually, that's pretty much what I imagine Bevell saying.theENGLISHseahawk":knrwaz6z said:Aros":knrwaz6z said:theENGLISHseahawk":knrwaz6z said:I also didn't think much of Bevell's performance at offensive tackle.
His kick in overtime sucked too.
Cute point you are trying to make but he still sucked.
The only 'cute' thing here is the need for you to identify a single scapegoat on a night when several different things were wrong.
I'm pretty sure Bevell didn't say to his OT's -- 'yeah just basically let them have a free run to the QB... maybe hold them a few times to put us in 1st and 20'.
But let's not have a proper discussion about the game when we can just SHOUT AT BEVELL AND ACT LIKE IT'S ALL ON HIM BECAZ HE IZ THE OC.
Threedee":1nljjbbl said:Actually, that's pretty much what I imagine Bevell saying.theENGLISHseahawk":1nljjbbl said:Aros":1nljjbbl said:theENGLISHseahawk":1nljjbbl said:I also didn't think much of Bevell's performance at offensive tackle.
His kick in overtime sucked too.
Cute point you are trying to make but he still sucked.
The only 'cute' thing here is the need for you to identify a single scapegoat on a night when several different things were wrong.
I'm pretty sure Bevell didn't say to his OT's -- 'yeah just basically let them have a free run to the QB... maybe hold them a few times to put us in 1st and 20'.
But let's not have a proper discussion about the game when we can just SHOUT AT BEVELL AND ACT LIKE IT'S ALL ON HIM BECAZ HE IZ THE OC.
Yes both sucked, and we can throw Cable into that category as well.Year of The Hawk":qqbe9sjz said:Could it be that Bevell and the O-line both sucked??? I am also sure he had lots less to work with because of the o-line performance. But he should have adjusted to that better. Lets erase this and move on.
Excellent point.Fade":34b32pgd said:In 16 games with the Seahawks Jimmy Graham has 1 red zone touchdown. 2 other longer receiving TDs. So 3 TDs total.
The best red zone weapon in the game. 1 TD in the red zone in 16 games. Exposed. He also got that TD his first game so... Jimmy has been shutout in the red zone for 15 straight games. If you don't think the OC has had a major impact on this streak I don't know what to say at this point.
NFSeahawks628":t7vl26z6 said:cymatica":t7vl26z6 said:Again, why not help the o-line with TE or RB chipping the ends. Didnt see that all game. Thats on coaching to recognize that
Another GREAT question.
Thank you and welcome to .net. Always good to get new posters that share good content. :2thumbs:
Chipping is not the same as staying in to block.justafan":3gwjyog6 said:NFSeahawks628":3gwjyog6 said:cymatica":3gwjyog6 said:Again, why not help the o-line with TE or RB chipping the ends. Didnt see that all game. Thats on coaching to recognize that
Another GREAT question.
Thank you and welcome to .net. Always good to get new posters that share good content. :2thumbs:
People would blame Bevell for asking Jimmy to block.
mrt144":1li69xor said:What could Bevell do to show that 18.5 ppg isn't everyone elses but his fault?