sc85sis
Well-known member
Maybe. Maybe not. USC hadn't been good for quite a while before Pete arrived. Three coaches turned that job down before Pete got it. The general consensus was that USC would never again be a football power.CPHawk":28uxwx5d said:hawknation2015":28uxwx5d said:CPHawk":28uxwx5d said:I'd bet SF had a similar thread when we hired Pete. I bet he turns them around a lot faster than the Rams get turned into a winner.
The thread was actually created by a Seahawks fan who adores Chip Kelly.
Chip Kelly is not Pete Carroll.
Put him at SC, and he would have had the same success. Don't lie to yourself.
There also has been major resistance to the idea of ever running a more spread-option or read-option type offense at 'SC. Sark's attempt to speed things up and go mostly shotgun was possibly as close as it will get any time soon.