NFSeahawks
New member
- Joined
- Sep 13, 2009
- Messages
- 4,714
- Reaction score
- 0
Lets just do the Pete thing and say the team is fine, we had a good year, 9-7 is solid.
KitsapGuy":hhy3ksrs said:[tweet]https://twitter.com/TheTransmission/status/948023626141282304[/tweet]
Uncle Si":2pe5nwfe said:While everyone is clutching their pearls about being passed by, their aren’t any stats for special teams listed. Might’ve been the difference between 9-7 and 11-5 this year.
Changes certainly need to occur. But that part of the team and the significance it played this season can’t be ignored when discussing the current status.
seahawkfreak":q9x644v9 said:Seattle Seahawks
Offense
2016 PPG: 22.1
2017 PPG: 22.9
2016: OYRD/G: 330.4
2017: OYRD/G: 357.2
Defense
2016: PAPG: 18.3
2017: PAPG: 20.8
2016: YAPG: 318.7
2017: YAPG: 323.2
2016: Turnover Ratio: +1
2017: Turnover Ratio: +8
2016 Record: 10-5-1, Division Champions, 1 Playoff win
2017 Record: 9-7, Out of the playoffs
The NFC has passed us by. It can't be just one thing. Lot has to change because next year our stats will probably go down as well.
Uncle Si":jykg1v55 said:While everyone is clutching their pearls about being passed by, their aren’t any stats for special teams listed. Might’ve been the difference between 9-7 and 11-5 this year.
Changes certainly need to occur. But that part of the team and the significance it played this season can’t be ignored when discussing the current status.
seahawkfreak":3o0sd92s said:Seattle Seahawks
2016 Kickoff Returns: #8, 808yds, 0 TDs
2017 Kickoff Return: #2, 1004yds, 1TDs
2016 Punt Return: 249yds, Avg 8.3, 0 TDs
2017 Punt Return: 237yds, Avg 6.6, 0 TDs
2016 Punting: 3126 yds, Avg 44.0, Yards returned 236yds-Avg= 8.4
2017 Punting: 4141 yds, Avg 45.0, Yards returned 452yds-Avg= 10.0
2016 Kicking: FGs, 33/37, 89.2% EPs, 29/35, 82.9%= 128pts
2017 Kicking: FGs, 21/29, 72.4% EPs, 37/38, 97.4%= 100pts
seahawkfreak":2b21xul8 said:Seattle Seahawks
2016 Kickoff Returns: #8, 808yds, 0 TDs
2017 Kickoff Return: #2, 1004yds, 1TDs
2016 Punt Return: 249yds, Avg 8.3, 0 TDs
2017 Punt Return: 237yds, Avg 6.6, 0 TDs
2016 Punting: 3126 yds, Avg 44.0, Yards returned 236yds-Avg= 8.4
2017 Punting: 4141 yds, Avg 45.0, Yards returned 452yds-Avg= 10.0
2016 Kicking: FGs, 33/37, 89.2% EPs, 29/35, 82.9%= 128pts
2017 Kicking: FGs, 21/29, 72.4% EPs, 37/38, 97.4%= 100pts
adeltaY":30klqvpf said:Yeah Hauschka was just awful last year, right?
MontanaHawk05":27pfwtt2 said:adeltaY":27pfwtt2 said:Yeah Hauschka was just awful last year, right?
Everyone wanted him gone.
Okung, Unger, now Haushcka...yes, folks, cutting an underperformer really CAN just lead to worse.
Of course Doug is going to defend Bevell, If he talks the truth about him he’s never getting his number called again.WindCityHawk":28ckey14 said:As seen in another thread, Baldwin commented on the offensive struggles and defended Bevell and the playcalling, so let's entertain that perspective. Let's say Bevell is actually great and the plays being called put us in the best position to succeed--what, then, is wrong?
Is it the QB play? Wilson accounted for an unprecedented percentage of the team's touchdowns this season, but is his erratic movement drawing penalties on the offensive line and prompting receivers to abandon their routes?
Is it the offensive line just not talented enough to compete at the pro level, which leads to whiffed blocks and penalties?
Are our running backs missing gaps and dancing too much? Or are they just too weak or slow?
Is our tight end blocking non-existent?
Are our receivers too slow? Too short? Incapable of getting open?
Or maybe there is no grand problem and a few tweaks here and there will propel this offense into the top five.
Note: this is not a threat to bash Bevell. We have enough of those for now. This thread presupposes Bevell is not a problem. So then: who or what is?
JimmyG":2l4mvzji said:People believe that Wilson is this transcendent, MVP-caliber talent, but then simultaneously think that him disappearing for entire halves of football is because of playcalling. I'm sorry, but that is asinine. People have conditioned themselves to reflexively spew out drivel excuses like "poor pass protection" or "long-developing routes" every time he gets sacked. I'm sorry, but watch the game. There are countless times every single game that he takes a sack because he takes off at the first hint of pressure and complicates things for the entire offense. He is very inconsistent.
The pass protection was a lot better after the Duane Brown trade. Just off the top of my head, I can think of about 5-10 instant replays that showed a defensive end / edge rusher blowing straight past Duane Brown and pressuring Wilson. Why? Because Wilson rarely steps up into the pocket; instead of climbing the pocket, he runs backwards and renders the pocket absolutely worthless. That is not the line's fault, it is his own fault.
Yet again, his flaws were on full display in the first half of the game yesterday. The last drive before halftime was absolutely abysmal. Check out the YouTube link below. Wilson has a clean pocket here for at least 3 seconds. Instead of standing in the pocket and delivering a pass, he starts running around and takes a huge loss. This is 100% on him. Even if you think that our receivers were covered, there is no excuse for taking that big of a loss. This is a 17-yard loss! How many times do we have a drive killed because of a massive loss from him running backwards like this, or from him picking up intentional grounding, or from him dancing around and the OL racking up a holding call in the process?
Link to specific highlight: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qMyBtMf0JxY#t=3m56s
At times he takes over games, and at times he destroys the offense. He is maddeningly inconsistent.
JimmyG":1sknqbi4 said:People believe that Wilson is this transcendent, MVP-caliber talent, but then simultaneously think that him disappearing for entire halves of football is because of playcalling.....