kearly":1qad6yld said:
drdiags":1qad6yld said:
Not relieved, just concerned that the team's Pro Personnel missed this so badly after claiming to have done their homework on Harvin. That he played after almost knocking out Tate prior to the Superbowl. He had to go but sounds like the team had/has a pretty dysfunctional locker room.
Pete has wanted Harvin since Harvin was in HS. I'm sure they did their homework. But Pete disregarded the signs in large part because this is a player he badly wanted for the better part of a decade.
And that is where the checks and balances should have come into play. I understand Pete's desire to have a top-level threat in the WR group, especially when a top-level talent like Harvin became available. His desire about this position has been out front since he got here with the courting of Brandon Marshall and Vincent Jackson. Somehow reason kept the team from pulling the trigger on either of those moves.
In hindsight, wish the voice against this move could have won the day for the long term impact. I didn't understand the move at the time but I am just a couch potato. My only concern is whether this trade ends up costing someone their job. This isn't something we can answer right now, but JS will most likely take the bullet for Pete's desire if anyone has to fall.
Again, just to re-iterate. I am not sitting here fuming about things just wondering about future implications this fail move means.