MacDonald vs Johnson decision time

[WmHBonney]

Don't forget about Dan Campbell trying to show how "ballsy" he is.

Yeah, sometimes you just need to kick the damn FG.

 

[pittpnthrs]

They had a ton of drop, Johnson was fine.

I still lean Johnson but would be pumped with either.

I'm in this boat too.

 

[Cyrus12]

Quinn.....

 

[Fresno Hawk]

I dont think this loss was on Johnson, it was Dan's fault. I prefer M.Macdonald but only because I'm a defense guy.

 

[getnasty]

The fact we're gonna need to develop a QB in the next couple of years I'm gonna lean Johnson. Had we had a long term solution I would actually like Mcdonald better. Both seems like great options though.

 

[pittpnthrs]

Maybe we can have both. Now that would make me giddy.

 

[hoxrox]

Either one would still be fine choices.

 

[JayhawkMike]

I am sure our receivers would go deep for Johnson.

 

[James in PA]

I'll just leave this here....

 

[NJlargent]

Granted they're sour right now, but the lions board has a ton of posts saying Johnson does not adjust well. They also think he's going to DC.

 

[hawkfan68]

No, Johnson can't be blamed for the drops but they only put up 6 points against the Rams in 2nd half of the WC game too. So two NFC West opponents where they had a bad 2nd half offense outing.

 

[pittpnthrs]

I'll just leave this here....
View attachment 64081

They scored twice as much as Seattle so it's still an upgrade.

 

[CPHawk]

That's why it's Quinn.

Doubt JS wants to lose his job. Hiring Quinn will mean he is out in 2 years when we go back to back 9-8 seasons.

 

[CallMeADawg]

No, Johnson can't be blamed for the drops but they only put up 6 points against the Rams in 2nd half of the WC game too. So two NFC West opponents where they had a bad 2nd half offense outing.

Exactly.

 

[CallMeADawg]

The fact we're gonna need to develop a QB in the next couple of years I'm gonna lean Johnson. Had we had a long term solution I would actually like Mcdonald better. Both seems like great options though.

Could get Kafka at OC. He is highly credited by Mahomes for excellent QB coaching.

 

[CactusJack]

Macdonald's resume is much more impressive. Given what he has to work with & the opponents he faced. He shutdown Mahomes in the 2nd half. The guy is excellent at making adjustments. He's a defensive wizard. He's unpredictable & keeps teams guessing.

What's not to like!???

 

[TOPHawk]

Hopefully not Johnson. The Lions offense disappeared in 2nd half in 2 of the 3 playoff games (Rams and 49ers).

Not really his fault. Two crucial dropped passes on plays that would have succeeded and extended drives. One other dropped pass that could have been a TD, although would have been a great catch. A coach is there to put players in the right place to succeed. It's then up to the player.

 

[Ozzy]

What if they’ve been waiting for Spags this whole time?

 

[Bobblehead]

uh oh.. Washington has him on their radar..https://www.cbssports.com/nfl/news/commanders-to-interview-ravens-dc-mike-macdonald-after-baltimores-afc-championship-loss-per-report/

 

[bigcc]

Meanwhile, Macdonald's defense took some punches at the start of that Chiefs game then were in pure lockdown mode. Lamar and the offense lost that game.

They had players in GREAT position, but a couple of those balls were quite literally undefendable... There's not a single player in the nfl that could have deflected/interrupted the early back shoulder throw to kelce for the td, Hamilton (very possibly dpoty) had him draped...

Plays like that aren't a scheme issue

That being said, I'm happy with either, but I'd take Macdonald....

I think our defense requires SIGNIFICANTLY more work than the offense, mediocre OC has an easier road to success given our skill positions than a mediocre DC with this defense