I really doubt this effects the Seahawks game planning anyhow. I think they are more concerned with their own injuries and practicing their own game
Heck the majority of discussion on this board is about our own players first
Unfortunately this will sound like homerism and blind confidence. But oh well
With a healthy Rodgers I would still be more surprised at a Seahawks loss than a Seahawks win. It would just be a lot harder with a 100% healthy Rodgers and a much closer game. And I think the Seahawks would have to screw up on a lot of things
If you think about it, no Seahawk will ever be league MVP: why? Because it's too hard to even pick a team MVP. We can't even decide if Russell or Marshawn is MVP on the offense. We can't decide if Earl, Sherman, Wagner, Chancellor, or even Bennett is a defensive MVP. What that also means is you don't have just a single point of failure. You would need all of them to fail for us to have a bad game and that's what I mean by a lot of things would have to go wrong . Just one of those guys or two of those guys fail and we still got the rest to pick the team back up
With a 100% Rodgers I still think it's a 70/30 proposition. With a 70% Rodgers I don't think that changes much, at most 78/22