Natethegreat":1vbxyb4h said:
The draft is about value. That is my point. Heck if you really like a guy and think he will succeed why not pick Smith in the first right?
So why did we wait till the third with Russel then? Russel has been far more important than Irvin for sure but we picked Irvin first because we operate off others boards as well.
He was projected as undrafted, not even priority free agent much like Statten was last year. I then stated we had three picks left we could have used to insure we got him.
I have nothing against the guy at all. I hope he succeeds it just looks like poor value when a guy like Bennet was sitting there to be had.
This opinion seems to get some people panties in a wad so whatever but like I said I had the same thoughts last year with Statten.
You are so WRONG, the draft is about getting players that will win you a Super Bowl, value is a grade people that are so called experts give prospects hoping that they are right. GM'S in the league rate them on how they fit their team, their chemistry, their personality, and what their mentality is like and if it will fit the philosophy they have.
There are 32 GM's in the league, I don't see anyone here's name listed in those 32.
When they pick is based on the profiles that most teams have of other teams needs along with how each GM and staff feel a players skill set is going to be looked at by other teams, that's why they pick them where they do, why Wilson was not a First round pick even though everyone says he had 1st round talent.
The Seahawks felt that they could get other players they wanted higher in the draft because of the way other teams perception of Wilson was.