RCATES":10716uyv said:The only reason the last game was close was because Rams lost Kupp and Cooks. I expect Kupp to have a huge day against us like he has in the past. Rams win by 17.
RCATES":4ocpl1ee said:The only reason the last game was close was because Rams lost Kupp and Cooks. I expect Kupp to have a huge day against us like he has in the past. Rams win by 17.
Ramfan128":4ocpl1ee said:knownone":4ocpl1ee said:The Rams have beat 1 team by 10 + points in the last 5 weeks the 49ers. The other 3 wins are by a combined 7 points.
I honestly think the Seahawks have a better chance of winning this game than the Rams do of winning it by 10+.
We're 4-0 at home so far:
34-0 against the Cardinals
35-23 against the Chargers
38-31 against the Vikings
29-27 against the Packers
We had double digit leads against both the Vikings and Packers - the Vikings got us right after Talib and Peters were injured, and a missed (chipshot) FG is what made this game look closer otherwise we win by 10+. The Packers had a bye so had two weeks to prep and both McCarthy and Rodgers have a very good record after their bye. And again, the Rams were still up by 10 at some point in that game.
The other games you're talking about are @Seattle - one of the toughest places to play, so just winning is impressive. @Denver - Rams were up 17 and Broncos scored a garbage time TD to avoid losing by 10. And then see Packers above.
IMO Rams by 10 makes sense. After a loss last year in the regular season the Rams were 4-0 with wins over the Jags, Saints and Seahawks (and Niners but obviously they were not a good team).
You've just outlined why the Rams by 10 does not make much sense. What happens in the games does not matter when it comes to the point spread, what matters is the final score. The only two teams you've beaten all season by 10 points are the Cardinals and 49ers, two objectively bad teams who've combined for seven 10(+) point defeats this season. The Seahawks have yet to lose a game all season by 10 points and the last game they played against the Rams came down to essentially the final play.Ramfan128":20bxecbj said:knownone":20bxecbj said:The Rams have beat 1 team by 10 + points in the last 5 weeks the 49ers. The other 3 wins are by a combined 7 points.
I honestly think the Seahawks have a better chance of winning this game than the Rams do of winning it by 10+.
We're 4-0 at home so far:
34-0 against the Cardinals
35-23 against the Chargers
38-31 against the Vikings
29-27 against the Packers
We had double digit leads against both the Vikings and Packers - the Vikings got us right after Talib and Peters were injured, and a missed (chipshot) FG is what made this game look closer otherwise we win by 10+. The Packers had a bye so had two weeks to prep and both McCarthy and Rodgers have a very good record after their bye. And again, the Rams were still up by 10 at some point in that game.
The other games you're talking about are @Seattle - one of the toughest places to play, so just winning is impressive. @Denver - Rams were up 17 and Broncos scored a garbage time TD to avoid losing by 10. And then see Packers above.
IMO Rams by 10 makes sense. After a loss last year in the regular season the Rams were 4-0 with wins over the Jags, Saints and Seahawks (and Niners but obviously they were not a good team).