Hmm call me crazy but I was hoping we could hold onto Browner if he could still play at a high level and it was cheap.
If Sherman and/or Maxwell get's injured and we don't have Browner ready? Hmm not too sure about how that scenario would play out...
I'm pretty disappointed about not matching 6 million a year for Tate. I was hoping we could get him for 5 million per year which would of been a HUGE steal in my opinion, but adding 1 more million to a huge steal and we can't match it?
When you see quotes like this:
"The Seahawks had made a "really, really, really low" offer 10 days ago, according to Tate
http://www.fieldgulls.com/2013-nfl-offs ... e-close-to
It just makes me wonder what they were thinking to just let Tate walk so easily... make him feel unwanted, etc...
If Harvin get's injured which is very likely they are REALLY going to regret not paying Tate what he's worth.
This Browner thing seems very speculative at this point, but if we trade him for super cheap and he can still play well I think that would be another mistake...
It seems they are really gonna go all out to overpay Sherman if they really just let Tate walk and would release Browner (if for super cheap).
Not sure how I feel about all this, if Sherman and Harvin get injured the whole NFL will laugh at us when half our salary is sitting on the sidelines.
Gonna wait to see how all this plays out... losing Tate for relatively cheap is the first very negative thing I can say about our team since all my offensive rants involving Bevell and our offensive philosophy when we lost games purely because of bad play calling.