Cartire":n7ne1zpd said:If anyone has proven they are a one read and run qb, its bj. Do not want.
And hes playing against the soon be cuts.
themunn":20xvfrpq said:Cartire":20xvfrpq said:If anyone has proven they are a one read and run qb, its bj. Do not want.
And hes playing against the soon be cuts.
Soon be RAIDER cuts too
the lowest of the low
I'm not sold on either Daniels or Pryor as a backup, so there's no doubt Jackson has that spot locked up. Pryor seems to be coming on leaps and bounds in one offseason with us however. I'd like to keep him as a developmental player - his physical attributes are unmatched in the league among QBs, and if we can somehow turn him into a competent backup he'd be worth that year of investment
ukeface: :thfight7:olyfan63":2zxkallt said:Right now, I'd rather see Pryor on the field than TJack, in the event Russell is unavailable. I think Pryor gives us a better chance to win, especially if he keeps progressing. Pryor has shown growth week-to-week. Yes, last week's pick was incredibly lame, but you can see Pryor doing the work and getting the learning.
Daniels looks better than TJack too, but I don't really know how to interpret his game with the limited reps he's gotten, against the other team's 3rd stringers.
So Pryor over TJack, for sure.
odd, that stat line was no surprise to me. I like BJ more and I didn't want Pryor or think much of him, but I have to admit that he's looked good on several occasions.Tokadub":9o5wzfhz said:I'm gonna have to re-watch the game if I wanna torture myself to confirm how bad Pryor was. Somehow he put up some decent stats:
11/17 = 64%
134 yards
7.9 average
1 TD
1 Sack
108.5 Rating
Somehow that stat line seems much better than what I saw from him visually. After watching this game I think we should cut him and keep just 2 QB's I just don't think he will over reach his potential. He's like an even more error prone Kaepernick with an even worst arm and terrible consistency. I don't wanna see him on the field in any real games.
I was starting to see the reasoning why we might keep 3 QB's but after Pryor's last 2 games I think we should just get rid of this bum. Not sure how he put up that stat line when he looked like a high school level talent to me. Really don't wanna rewatch this game but I might have to so I can pay closer attention to Pryor's performance.
I lost my 100% focus for this game when our defensive starters looked like they collectively pooped their pants during their White House visit. What an ugly game.
Couldn't have evaluated any better.olyfan63":2zj0e2kf said:Right now, I'd rather see Pryor on the field than TJack, in the event Russell is unavailable. I think Pryor gives us a better chance to win, especially if he keeps progressing. Pryor has shown growth week-to-week. Yes, last week's pick was incredibly lame, but you can see Pryor doing the work and getting the learning.
Daniels looks better than TJack too, but I don't really know how to interpret his game with the limited reps he's gotten, against the other team's 3rd stringers.
So Pryor over TJack, for sure.