Largent80
New member
So the balls hitting Kearse, Baldwin, and Willson in their hands were invisible?
I saw them, and I saw them dropped.
I saw them, and I saw them dropped.
Russell is not the problem here... All year our receivers have failed to get separation, all year they have failed to catch contested balls. We do not have a big bodied receiver that can come down with contested balls, nor are any of our receivers great at running routes except Baldwin. Simply put, we do not HAVE the wide receivers to take advantage of.DavidSeven":adz5s6li said:Russell didn't play well.
Is that on the OC? Maybe. But Russell isn't utilizing his receivers. Hasn't done so all year. Maybe that's a playcalling issue; maybe it's a protection issue; maybe it's a WR talent issue; maybe it's QB issue. Dallas, just like Arizona last year, gave Russell one-on-ones in coverage all day long. Seattle couldn't capitalize.
Sending Harvin on go-routes all game long isn't going to miraculously fix this offense. He isn't a go-route receiver and never has been.
We need to make teams pay for one-on-one coverage. That will take a defender out of the box.
Russell needs to complete some real NFL throws. Bottom line. Putting it all at Bevell's feet still isn't addressing the heart of the issue.
Golden Tate is getting volume statistics. Right now he has 38 receptions which is half of his highest total in Seattle on 53 targets which is just over half of his 2013 targets in just 6 games. Tate also plays next to a guy named Calvin Johnson who happens to draw coverage away from Tate. In 2013 Tate was drawing most of the coverage, because he was really the only guy we had that could play on the outside, or make contested balls consistently.DavidSeven":25gill3f said:I agree that our receivers are part of the problem, though not the entire problem. Golden Tate is playing like a top 5 WR on a different team. He vanished in several games last year and was continually blasted for not getting separation. He didn't suddenly get that much more talented this year.
Spin Doctor":qtl92z5f said:Golden Tate is getting volume statistics. Right now he has 38 receptions which is half of his highest total in Seattle on 53 targets which is just over half of his 2013 targets in just 6 games. Tate also plays next to a guy named Calvin Johnson who happens to draw coverage away from Tate. In 2013 Tate was drawing most of the coverage, because he was really the only guy we had that could play on the outside, or make contested balls consistently.DavidSeven":qtl92z5f said:I agree that our receivers are part of the problem, though not the entire problem. Golden Tate is playing like a top 5 WR on a different team. He vanished in several games last year and was continually blasted for not getting separation. He didn't suddenly get that much more talented this year.
seahawk 17":1k9f4d2w said:Bevell reminds me of Dave Kreig. When he is hot, he is unbeatable. When he is cold, you wonder how the guy has a job.
Within our current philosophy there is no room to put up the numbers. We are running a college offense right now that is predicated upon options, and slants, hooks, and checkdowns and is completely reliant upon miss-direction. Where we are right now is a direct result of the receivers, and the game planning. Russell Wilson is fine as a player, in fact without him we would have even less production with the O-Line we have now.DavidSeven":3r0azwrl said:Spin Doctor":3r0azwrl said:Golden Tate is getting volume statistics. Right now he has 38 receptions which is half of his highest total in Seattle on 53 targets which is just over half of his 2013 targets in just 6 games. Tate also plays next to a guy named Calvin Johnson who happens to draw coverage away from Tate. In 2013 Tate was drawing most of the coverage, because he was really the only guy we had that could play on the outside, or make contested balls consistently.DavidSeven":3r0azwrl said:I agree that our receivers are part of the problem, though not the entire problem. Golden Tate is playing like a top 5 WR on a different team. He vanished in several games last year and was continually blasted for not getting separation. He didn't suddenly get that much more talented this year.
Calvin Johnson has been hobbled with an ankle injury and has missed chunks (or all) of the last three games. Tate has been their de facto #1 WR for at least the last three weeks.
Volume is part philosophy, part a willingness of the QB to get the ball down the field. This team loses targets because the ball is frequently pulled down for a QB run or a checkdown. That's why our receivers are disappearing. Within the current philosophy, there is room WRs to put up some numbers. The QB needs to get them the ball, and they need to get open.
austinslater25":1a2wym0e said:Brock said after watching the game tape that the receivers flat out didn't win the individual matchups on the outside and were consistently losing to the DB's. I think Wilson can play better but if the WR's can't win the one on one matchups it doesn't matter who is throwing the football. He also put some balls on the money in tight coverage(again not winning the one on one) only to have the passes dropped. How is this on Wilson?
Can he play better? Of course. He is far from the problem in my opinion.
rideaducati":2zp8mrhn said:seahawk 17":2zp8mrhn said:I have stayed out of the Bevell threads for about a year, but this makes me want to puke. Harvin is the fastest guy in the NFL, and he hasn't ran a WR route in weeks. Everybody knows RW is throwing a screen or it's a fly sweep. We had three 1st downs in the 1st half?
Bevell reminds me of Dave Kreig. When he is hot, he is unbeatable. When he is cold, you wonder how the guy has a job.
If Bevell had a hot Dave Kreig, he'd call for a run on every play.
Sarlacc83":15cnis9l said:The thing which worries me is receiver size. I thought about it a bit before the season started and kind of blew it off in my own mind
Shouldn't have.
Bigger, faster, stronger only hits 1 of the 3. Meanwhile Dallas trots out 2 big 6'2 receivers and a 6'6 Jason Witten. Our tallest active receiver is...Kearse?