What number will Graham wear in Seattle?

pmedic920

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Jul 12, 2013
Messages
28,864
Reaction score
4,604
Location
On the lake, Livingston Texas
My guess is 88. That's all we can do at this point, right?

I really like the idea of 11 however.
I'm one of the group that sees him being a WR and not a TE.
ALSO like the idea of folks that paid good money for Harvin jerseys being able to repurpose them.
 

MVP53

New member
Joined
Feb 13, 2014
Messages
294
Reaction score
0
Since I have an odd sense of humor and enjoy when players choose the oddest and most aesthetically unappealing number they can, I'd love it if Graham went with 43, 44 or 47, something like that. I'm chuckling just thinking about it.
 

stack600

New member
Joined
Jul 20, 2013
Messages
232
Reaction score
0
Location
Chehalis, WA
Dang3Russ":32yfwc3f said:
The Proshop is showing 0 for his jersey. Usure whether that is the number he is going with it, or just because it's still undecided. Are you even allowed to have 0 in the NFL? Can't remember even seeing that, only in the NBA.

80 should never be worn again ... Largent trumps everyone.

Either way, what ever number he chooses, it'll still look good cause it's on a Seattle Jersey!

#GoHawks
Jim Otto Oakland Raiders Double 0 or 00. Also I remember a Saint I think 60s era with 00.
I like the trade. Hate to see Max go, but he has been banged up last 2 years. The 1st round pick was like a high 2nd at 31. Now if his ego is like we kinda think after the playoff game were Irvin and Bennett were pissed off. Thats not good. But if he comes in and produces and excepts the team 1st concept. then great.
I'm going 88 also.
 

Hawks46

New member
Joined
Apr 30, 2009
Messages
7,498
Reaction score
0
MVP53":34qwma2y said:
Since I have an odd sense of humor and enjoy when players choose the oddest and most aesthetically unappealing number they can, I'd love it if Graham went with 43, 44 or 47, something like that. I'm chuckling just thinking about it.

What the heck is wrong with 44 ? How is it unappealing ? I wore it in high school (and 46), and the great Bosworth wore 44 in college. Plus you have 44 magnum. :cry:
 

Spleenhawk2.0

Member
Joined
Apr 6, 2010
Messages
355
Reaction score
0
stack600":21jozurh said:
Dang3Russ":21jozurh said:
The Proshop is showing 0 for his jersey. Usure whether that is the number he is going with it, or just because it's still undecided. Are you even allowed to have 0 in the NFL? Can't remember even seeing that, only in the NBA.
Jim Otto Oakland Raiders Double 0 or 00. Also I remember a Saint I think 60s era with 00.

I don't remember any Saints wearing 00, but I do remember Ken Burrough for the Oilers wearing 00 during the 1970's
 

MVP53

New member
Joined
Feb 13, 2014
Messages
294
Reaction score
0
Hawks46":30tatcf2 said:
MVP53":30tatcf2 said:
Since I have an odd sense of humor and enjoy when players choose the oddest and most aesthetically unappealing number they can, I'd love it if Graham went with 43, 44 or 47, something like that. I'm chuckling just thinking about it.

What the heck is wrong with 44 ? How is it unappealing ? I wore it in high school (and 46), and the great Bosworth wore 44 in college. Plus you have 44 magnum. :cry:

To be clear, for a LB, it is fine. But, a TE wearing 44, or anything in the 40s for that matter? Just wouldn't look right, which is why I hope he does it. Wasn't picking on 44 specifically.
 

HawkFan72

Active member
Joined
Mar 3, 2007
Messages
16,570
Reaction score
1
Location
Bay Area, CA
How long until Graham becomes the best Seahawk to wear 88? Itula Mili was probably the best before.
 

253hawk

Active member
Joined
Sep 13, 2013
Messages
3,322
Reaction score
15
Location
PNW
MVP53":i3woh5cf said:
To be clear, for a LB, it is fine. But, a TE wearing 44, or anything in the 40s for that matter? Just wouldn't look right, which is why I hope he does it. Wasn't picking on 44 specifically.

Chris Cooley was #47 and Dallas Clark was #44. There's always a handful floating around the league.
 

MVP53

New member
Joined
Feb 13, 2014
Messages
294
Reaction score
0
253hawk":298ab7wa said:
MVP53":298ab7wa said:
To be clear, for a LB, it is fine. But, a TE wearing 44, or anything in the 40s for that matter? Just wouldn't look right, which is why I hope he does it. Wasn't picking on 44 specifically.

Chris Cooley was #47 and Dallas Clark was #44. There's always a handful floating around the league.

Yes, I know there's always some. I just get a kick out of it.

That's one thing I love about college football over the NFL. Love it when a DL is rocking a single digit number.

Marcus Trufant sported 45 in college and it always cracked me up.
 

NorCalHawk12

New member
Joined
Dec 29, 2012
Messages
896
Reaction score
0
Location
Oroville, CA (not WA)
IJHSIDGF-ML":38f1wonl said:
Kamcussionator":38f1wonl said:
Give him 83 and see if he can protect a slant route with his body...
This
Just as some say they can't concentrate on my posts, I can't concentrate on yours.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
88 is okay by me. Or 83, Steve Raible...
 

BadgerVid

New member
Joined
Sep 11, 2012
Messages
251
Reaction score
0
I believe he said yesterday that 88 appealed to him..."because it is round".
 

Basis4day

Active member
Joined
Aug 15, 2011
Messages
5,924
Reaction score
0
[tweet]https://twitter.com/RapSheet/status/576451618427641857[/tweet]

This made me laugh.
 

Latest posts

Top