TwistedHusky":ib2f7efb said:
Dark,
You know I am considered a 'Wilson hater' here right? Fanboy for Wilson? yeah...
( I am not, btw, but far far from a 'fanboy')
You also know I wanted to keep Wilson out of both the GB and Cards game.
But thinking Geno would have resulted in anything but a loss? Laughable.
Yes Geno should have played. We would have lost. Not just because of Geno but because of all the things GB is better than us at on that list. Notably much better game day coaching.
There was little circumstance we would have won because we were outclassed in so many ways before the kickoff. The Packers are an 8 win team. We are a 3 win team. They are on top of their division, we are at the bottom. Losing to us is like losing the Bengals, it can happen but it isn't likely.
We are in a tier with the Dolphins and Jets. Not Packers and Rams.
This is such mind-numbing reductive thinking. We were not 'outclassed' in any sense in the ACTUAL GAME except on offense.
Thinking Geno might have resulted in anything but a loss is not 'laughable' it's actually reasonable because I expect Geno would have given us equivalent points to what any normal NFL level QB (backup or not) is capable of which would have put us SQUARELY in the game.
There was not 'little' circumstance we would have won. We were down by three up to the fourth quarter! Why do you keep talking about hypothetical Packers team that dominated us when the real Packers team did anything but?
Rodgers nearly threw two pick-6s before the first quarter was even over.
The real problem with this team, the real frustration, the real reason Pete needs to go is NOT because we are not in a tier with the Rams and Packers. It's because we easily could be if we had a coach who was willing to adjust, change, and knew how to manage a game. We are a 3-6 team but we could EASILY be a 6-3 team right now.