HommyHawk
New member
- Joined
- Dec 5, 2010
- Messages
- 320
- Reaction score
- 0
27 -13 Hawks
RolandDeschain":3s204zwd said:I think I just came while reading hgwellz12's 4th-quarter prediction.
So why isn't this considered derailing a thread? It has nothing to do with Aros' prediction thread, just someone who is trying hard to be funny and failing? Just trying to understand policy.hgwellz12":3kctn8dc said:RolandDeschain":3kctn8dc said:I think I just came while reading hgwellz12's 4th-quarter prediction.
hahaaa! To be honest, IT was a lil bit hard to type that bold of a prediction...I'll dry hump a tree in front of a sorority house in the U District for a full 24 hours if the last part comes true!
Siouxhawk":2mu10tri said:So why isn't this considered derailing a thread? It has nothing to do with Aros' prediction thread, just someone who is trying hard to be funny and failing? Just trying to understand policy.hgwellz12":2mu10tri said:RolandDeschain":2mu10tri said:I think I just came while reading hgwellz12's 4th-quarter prediction.
hahaaa! To be honest, IT was a lil bit hard to type that bold of a prediction...I'll dry hump a tree in front of a sorority house in the U District for a full 24 hours if the last part comes true!
It has nothing to do with this thread. Just your attempt at trying to be a funny guy. Just looking for interpretation on why it isn't considered derailing? That is all.hgwellz12":11u5bydn said:Siouxhawk":11u5bydn said:So why isn't this considered derailing a thread? It has nothing to do with Aros' prediction thread, just someone who is trying hard to be funny and failing? Just trying to understand policy.hgwellz12":11u5bydn said:RolandDeschain":11u5bydn said:I think I just came while reading hgwellz12's 4th-quarter prediction.
hahaaa! To be honest, IT was a lil bit hard to type that bold of a prediction...I'll dry hump a tree in front of a sorority house in the U District for a full 24 hours if the last part comes true!
because it isn't. And even if it was, why are you dry snitching? Did it sting a little bit while you read it?
What about it bothers you so much? Had I said nothing about your boo you would've kept it moving..you and
everyone else knows it. Why not have a Coke and a smile and sit your happy ass down somewhere? You
can ignore my posts. You know that, right?
Aros":2rd8xnxn said:MontanaHawk05":2rd8xnxn said:Same old story. Bevell dillies around in the first half (on Pete's orders) and gets Wilson pummeled, they come roaring back on offense in the 2nd, but by then the winded defense has started giving up big runs to Gurley.
It won't be a blowout - the Rams only scored 20 against the only decent defense they've faced so far. And I'm not too worried about the injuries - we have depth at every position that's hurting, and I don't think Rees can be downgraded upon.
But they always play us hard, and their strength (DL) hits our weakness (OL) perfectly, and Pete won't deploy the appropriate countermeasures until we're way behind. Our second-half comeback falls short.
SEA 23
STL 26
YTD: 2-2
I bet this proves to be the most accurate prediction of how the game unfolds. In fact, I will be rather surprised if it's not.
Decimation":1jokzdhe said:Rams 33
Hawks 16
Still hope we kick their ass, I hate the Rams.
toffee":1hd4zrjn said:I am going to bet against the norm and predict: 25 - 13 Hawks