hawkfan68
Well-known member
LeftHandSmoke":174rs5hx said:hawkfan68":174rs5hx said:Sgt. Largent":174rs5hx said:NOLAHawk":174rs5hx said:Sherman is going to have a field day [hopefully] with that 4th and inches play.
Sherman's next temper tantrum should be at himself in the mirror and the rest of the defense for giving up 34 pts to a team that's not even in the playoffs...............and we had everything to play for.
The offense did it's share of putting the defense on it's heels. Fumble in their own side of the field, blocked FG, blocked punt, missed extra point. Yes the defense didn't play well but the offense is more to blame for dropping this game, IMO.
The Seahawks offense was about as good as the Cards. See here.
The biggest disappointment to me out of this game aside from the Lockett injury (which was not due the O or the D's performance) was the D (both D's really) giving up as many points as they did. It would have been far more encouraging had this been a low-scoring win because our D is where the Hawks strength is most expected to be.
Terrell may get less playing time this week to give others a shot, it wouldn't surprise me.
They lost this game due to the lack of blocking. The OL was putrid. How many FG attempts, Extra Point attempts, and punts did the Cards have blocked? 0. That's the difference. The defense wasn't great but if the OL could have blocked better on ST, they probably would have won.