Here we go again. Rawls Questionable for game 1...

LeftHandSmoke

Active member
Joined
May 14, 2016
Messages
1,580
Reaction score
1
King Dog":1h4sr2mo said:
I'm pretty happy. When we signed Lacy I was like sweet, there's a chance we'll have at least 1 decent back available for every game this season. Now with Carson, I feel like it's a lock that at least 1 out of our 4 backs will be available each game.
Agreed.

Fwiw, Brian Blogger thinks Carson may be inactive Sunday
http://www.hawkblogger.com/2017/09/best ... ckers.html

RB Chris Carson

This is a tough call, both because Carson is very talented and because the team could decide to give Thomas Rawls another week to heal from his high ankle sprain. Rawls has practiced all week, and my guess is he suits up. If he does, it would be hard to justify having four running backs active on game day. Carson has shown some ability on special teams, so he might push someone else off the active roster outside of the running back room.
 

Seahwkgal

Well-known member
Joined
Apr 30, 2009
Messages
5,104
Reaction score
208
I have never understood why the full 53 cannot be active for games. WTH? It has always pissed me off.
 

chris98251

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 27, 2007
Messages
39,667
Reaction score
1,688
Location
Roy Wa.
If Lockett is healthy Pete said he would return Punts and Kick offs, so McKissic could be the guy inactive.
 

Latest posts

Top