Popeyejones":392skihm said:
Trenchbroom":392skihm said:
UK_Seahawk, that was a "Webzone" quality post. In other words, no quality at all.
Not piling on, but a post like that about a Hawks player would get you banned on the Webzone, no questions asked. 9ers fans there get warnings for personal attacks on Hawks fans who post there, rather than the more lenient policies here (which are more lenient all around, IMO).
What? What are you talking about? You guys post how you want our players to be injuried/maimed/killed in every forum. Not in a smack shack, but right there in the main forums for all to see: Seahawks are cheaters, adderall, Pete the Cheat, etc.
Just because UK's statement was about Kaep's mother--that somehow makes it worse? Enough for you to "put on airs" and talk like your forum is better than ours? Please.
I agree 100% about leniency here at .Net. You know damn good and well that if you, Marvin, Livinginhwktwn, etc. were Seahawk fans going to your board and conducted yourselves the exact same way you do here, your post counts before permanent banishment would be in the single digits. Our mods let us CONVERSE here. Yes, even with trolls who like to be here more than the shothole forum they came from.
Sure "9ers fans there get warnings for personal attacks on Hawks fans who post there"--because any Hawk fan who still is allowed to post there is only able to do so because it's taken 500 posts of kissing ass to keep their access! So yeah, they are protected--like a pet is protected by it's owner.
I've only seen 2-3 "regular" Hawk fans over there and I swear your mods only keep them around so they can keep up the appearance that counter arguments are "welcome". But we KNOW that isn't true, right Popeye?
