Steve2222":2tln1npd said:lol how could anyone take 2013 Bennett over 1992 Cortez. That’s silly.
Tez is the obvious choice based off need.
Steve2222":3v7se3a7 said:lol how could anyone take 2013 Bennett over 1992 Cortez. That’s silly.
Tez is the obvious choice based off need.
Seymour":7i5behuy said:Steve2222":7i5behuy said:lol how could anyone take 2013 Bennett over 1992 Cortez. That’s silly.
Tez is the obvious choice based off need.
My guess is they do not have enough king dogs to put Tez on this roster. :twisted:
(this is a test to see if anyone has a clue what I'm talking about)
homerun1970":2ngfu2pn said:Seymour":2ngfu2pn said:Steve2222":2ngfu2pn said:lol how could anyone take 2013 Bennett over 1992 Cortez. That’s silly.
Tez is the obvious choice based off need.
My guess is they do not have enough king dogs to put Tez on this roster. :twisted:
(this is a test to see if anyone has a clue what I'm talking about)
Do you want Mirer as well? My vote Tez as well
I disagree.Rat":14lwibn7 said:I get your viewpoint, but for me, talent trumps everything else. I think you can mask weaknesses with a supreme player at another position than fill them with a lesser one. Not that Steve Hutchinson was a nobody; he was really, really good, and probably very underrated historically, but I still think Walt was a much better LT than Hutch was a LG.
I loved watching Fredd (with 2 D’s) Young. :2thumbs:chris98251":oenez2lq said:Well Carl Eller, Charlie Young, John Randle, Tez, Jacob Green, Easley, Rufus Porter, Michael Sinclair all in their prime, oh and all played here, Don't forget Fredd Young also.
We do like to run on manageable down and distances, but that just means that when we do pass it tends to be really important third downs or when we have disadvantageous down and distances and the difficulty is high.kobebryant":1pof1ivm said:I don't believe that they pass enough to take full advantage of a prime Jerry Rice or Steve Largent.
Oh, gracious. Yikes.Rat":3aqt3p27 said:Shawn Springs > Richard Sherman