Tical21
Well-known member
- Joined
- Mar 16, 2012
- Messages
- 5,541
- Reaction score
- 82
Bevell is absolutely right. Gonna get Russell killed, but he's right.
rcaido":3t9ls3ic said:[Wilson isn't elite? Can you name 5 other QB you would rather have then him?
Wilson has the most comeback wins since he came to the league. WE all know his first three year stat. I think the Bengals was the first time i've seen him not able to come through or come close to at least making a game winning drive. Kid is clutch
This whole trust thing is mumbo jumbo, Wilson has good instinct as QB. He knows when to break down & scramble, the problem for him & my only criticism is he would rather throw the ball then run.
RiverDog":4b3zkg55 said:rcaido":4b3zkg55 said:[Wilson isn't elite? Can you name 5 other QB you would rather have then him?
Wilson has the most comeback wins since he came to the league. WE all know his first three year stat. I think the Bengals was the first time i've seen him not able to come through or come close to at least making a game winning drive. Kid is clutch
This whole trust thing is mumbo jumbo, Wilson has good instinct as QB. He knows when to break down & scramble, the problem for him & my only criticism is he would rather throw the ball then run.
Did you watch the Rams game this year? How about the Super Bowl?
Going back to the SB, we have lost 4th quarter leads in 4 of our last 6 games, each one of those turning out to be a loss, and that's not considering the Lions game that had it been called by the book, in all likelihood would have made it 5 out of 6. Where has the clutch Russell Wilson been in those games? Or does coming close count?
rcaido":1ofop666 said:Wilson has 42w - 17L 15 of those are game winning drives yeah i would say he is clutch. The last couple of games not so good but like i said Bengals was the only game i saw him not give his team a chance to win.
4 out 6?
You cant fault him in the Rams game he got them the lead but Bailey slipped & Lynch couldn't get 1yrd. Why would you include Packers & Lions in this convo?
So pretty much just the Patriots & Bengals game...Even these games i would say he did enough to win the game.
RiverDog":177jik8h said:rcaido":177jik8h said:Wilson has 42w - 17L 15 of those are game winning drives yeah i would say he is clutch. The last couple of games not so good but like i said Bengals was the only game i saw him not give his team a chance to win.
4 out 6?
You cant fault him in the Rams game he got them the lead but Bailey slipped & Lynch couldn't get 1yrd. Why would you include Packers & Lions in this convo?
So pretty much just the Patriots & Bengals game...Even these games i would say he did enough to win the game.
Over the past 3 years, yea, Russell's been clutch, won a lot of big games for us. But that wasn't the point. The point is what has he done for us lately, or more specifically, the past 6 games?
The reason I included the Lions is that Russell committed a turnover in the 4th quarter that was returned for a touchdown putting the Lions back in the game then could not sustain a 4th quarter drive to put them away. We scored just 13 points at home against a still winless team that the Cards rang up 42 against just week later. That was a terrible performance by everyone on the offensive side of the ball, including the QB.
In both the Packers and Rams games Russell had opportunities to win games with 4th quarter drives but for whatever reason, he didn't, which is why I noted that 5 out of the last 6 he's failed to come through in the clutch.
The past 5 contested games, in which we have lost 4, is not the type of performances that we have come to expect from Russell. He's played way better football than he's shown us here recently.
Hawkpower":1efi8m2x said:People have always recognized his weaknesses across the NFL, if not here.
The majority of fans on this site pushed it aside when we are winning, and for good reason. If it isnt affecting the bottom line, no problem.
Well, his play has contributed to some early season losses. So the weaknesses again become front and center.
Imagine this if you will:
We lose to Green Bay last year. Probably should have, all things considered, yes? What do you think the topic of conversation would have been all off-season? Wilson's PUTRID performance for 98% of that game. Better believe it.
The only reason it wasnt was because of our miraculous comeback.
Also, do you think Russell's demands for elite QB money combined with his lack of growth as a QB since making those ridiculous commands weigh on our minds a bit?
Yep. We are now committed to this guy. He HAS to be elite now. Fans are worried, and justifiably so.
rcaido":2f3cllll said:Hawkpower":2f3cllll said:People have always recognized his weaknesses across the NFL, if not here.
The majority of fans on this site pushed it aside when we are winning, and for good reason. If it isnt affecting the bottom line, no problem.
Well, his play has contributed to some early season losses. So the weaknesses again become front and center.
Imagine this if you will:
We lose to Green Bay last year. Probably should have, all things considered, yes? What do you think the topic of conversation would have been all off-season? Wilson's PUTRID performance for 98% of that game. Better believe it.
The only reason it wasnt was because of our miraculous comeback.
Also, do you think Russell's demands for elite QB money combined with his lack of growth as a QB since making those ridiculous commands weigh on our minds a bit?
Yep. We are now committed to this guy. He HAS to be elite now. Fans are worried, and justifiably so.
Russell is elite. The only thing im worried about is his health throughout the season. He is not the reason why we loss those games, we can easily be 5-0. Why no one judging Thomas, Sherman, Wagner, & im sure Kam situation had something to do with the first two losses. Our constant costly penalties. Our swiss cheese O-line & finally our predictable OC.
Russell is special & im fortunate to have such a player i can root for then against.
Hawkpower":35ule205 said:rcaido":35ule205 said:I always thought Wilson was the best QB for this team & i wouldn't trade him for any QB. After barely losing our last SB, it seems the fans have gone to what have you done for me lately or maybe its just this site. We are the greatest winners but the worse losers.
I'll see you guys in the Wilson bandwagon when the Seahawks win the division going 12-4.
People have always recognized his weaknesses across the NFL, if not here.
The majority of fans on this site pushed it aside when we are winning, and for good reason. If it isnt affecting the bottom line, no problem.
Well, his play has contributed to some early season losses. So the weaknesses again become front and center.
Imagine this if you will:
We lose to Green Bay last year. Probably should have, all things considered, yes? What do you think the topic of conversation would have been all off-season? Wilson's PUTRID performance for 98% of that game. Better believe it.
The only reason it wasnt was because of our miraculous comeback.
Also, do you think Russell's demands for elite QB money combined with his lack of growth as a QB since making those ridiculous commands weigh on our minds a bit?
Yep. We are now committed to this guy. He HAS to be elite now. Fans are worried, and justifiably so.
rcaido":2ufx4lfk said:Yeah this what have you done for me lately is disgusting & shameful IMO but what can you do. As i mention, during the Rams game he gave us the lead. How can you blame him for this lost?
Wilson has some improvements and adjustments he still has to handle but he isn't the problem. Luckily our schedule isn't to terribly difficult to do what they did last year. By then, all this nonsense talk will be gone.
Hawkpower":3ik00hq9 said:Only person that shares what opinion? That he is fringe top 10, but not elite?
Cmon, you don't really believe that, do you? :lol:
Read through a couple threads here and then get back with me 8)
scutterhawk":39cijjjr said:Hawkpower":39cijjjr said:rcaido":39cijjjr said:I always thought Wilson was the best QB for this team & i wouldn't trade him for any QB. After barely losing our last SB, it seems the fans have gone to what have you done for me lately or maybe its just this site. We are the greatest winners but the worse losers.
I'll see you guys in the Wilson bandwagon when the Seahawks win the division going 12-4.
People have always recognized his weaknesses across the NFL, if not here.
The majority of fans on this site pushed it aside when we are winning, and for good reason. If it isnt affecting the bottom line, no problem.
Well, his play has contributed to some early season losses. So the weaknesses again become front and center.
Imagine this if you will:
We lose to Green Bay last year. Probably should have, all things considered, yes? What do you think the topic of conversation would have been all off-season? Wilson's PUTRID performance for 98% of that game. Better believe it.
The only reason it wasnt was because of our miraculous comeback.
Also, do you think Russell's demands for elite QB money combined with his lack of growth as a QB since making those ridiculous commands weigh on our minds a bit?
Yep. We are now committed to this guy. He HAS to be elite now. Fans are worried, and justifiably so.
This is a short sighted and ridiculous post, with SO many unrealistic, and unsubstantiated holes ukeface:
The biggest joke on display here, is all the pissing and moaning about Russell Wilson FINALLY getting paid some decent money.
Some of Y'all are acting all indignant, and like the money he's getting, is coming right out of your pocket :roll:
The O-line is FAR from playing even mediocre football right now.
Instantaneous break downs in the O-line protection, have been far too damned frequent for Russell Wilson to TRUST that he won't get hammered (like he all to often has been in the first few games), and it's THOSE kinds of inconsistencies that throws a wrench in his development.
It's like trying to polish a turd with shoe brush.
IF Lynch can come back healthy, THAT will help to get back to what the Seahawks have been doing for the last three Years.
BUT, in order for Russell Wilson to DEVELOP (Post Lynch) as we all know he can, this O-line is going to have to simultaneously step up with their development.
Wilson isn't a one man gang, THAT's why they have 10 other players in there.
I also trust that RW has the work ethics, moxie and skills to "Get It", I don't have the same trust that some of his fans do "Get It"
chris98251":3sr6fxlz said:Bevell: Russell Wilson has to “continually trust” offensive linemen
http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.co...n-has-to-continually-trust-offensive-linemen/
This is why we can't have nice things on offense, trust is earned, you just don't give it freely especially when it's your body getting slammed to the turf by 300 pound men.
When your sacked or unable to throw 39 percent of the time that's a pretty good reason to say I don't trust them.
chris98251":3dm9dtn3 said:These are his statements, did you read the article ?
He made the thread I just posted the link, 39 percent of the time he gets nailed or is unable to make a throw due to the line.
If you were in the circus and were the model that the knife throwing guy was throwing knives around and he was only 60 percent accurate how would you feel? What would your trust level be? Or the guys that catch on the Trapeze, if he missed 40 percent of the time? Then have a guy like Bevell come up and say trust them, eventually they will get better.
Granted these are extreme, but to show that your asking someone to put their livelihood in the hands of those that have proven themselves incapable at this juncture of doing their job is asking a lot. If Wilson were to get injured what would Bevell say? He should have ran instead of trusting them or recognized the breakdown?
Again blame the player instead of his scheme or adaption to create passing lanes or hot reads given the circumstances.