hawksfansinceday1":119060xo said:And the problem is those guys haven't gotten themchris98251":119060xo said:justafan":119060xo said:Clowney is a tough call. This is his contract year I would have expected more. I doubt he will get better after a career contract. He played tough, did the dirty work and even took over a couple games but for 22 mil you need to get sacks.
We can have one of the worst Ds in the league with or without him or any of the other players. Right now I dont feel much love for anyone on the D side of the ball. I had high hopes for Reed until the suspension.
Back to the draft and see what we can get, hope Green,Poona and Collier develop and see whats out there in FA.
This team has a few more chances to prove they are woth keeping,hopefully the intensity is turned up a notch or 3
This is where you are wrong, when he demands two and three players to defend him he will not get sacks, at least not the double digit ones that Stat idiots attribute to good players, he does however open the way for 3 and 4 other guys to spread Sacks out amongst them.
I cant disagree. He needs help, most DL that command 22 mil get a lot of double teams. But like I said its a tough call for me I love the guy but I am a bigger fan of the team. We are spending a lot of money on players and not getting the results. If we are even in the top 15 on D I would say we have to keep him but we are near the bottom. We cant get much worse without him. I think spending that money on top end CB and more team speed might go further than paying Clowney and Wright. I am a big fan of both players. Last year I thought Reed was a must keep player but this year he is JAG. It wouldnt surprise if he develops into one of the best DTs in the game but can you pay him with the results of the D?
I have been hopeful about this D all year,if they get lit up in the playoffs I am all in for wholesale changes on that side of the ball. I am not hung up on the name on the back of a jersey I just want a tough fast D that can carry their weight. Its all about the D being better than the sum of the parts and we arent there.