MontanaHawk05":3ucwwt81 said:
Bobblehead":3ucwwt81 said:
BTW a young Left Tackle, that cannot tackle or is injured is not better than an aging expensive FA, who happened to be all-pro.
Who do you want gone so that we can sign said LT?
Because you do have to get rid of someone, and I don't see anyone on this team who isn't playing vital roles right now. That includes Jimmy Graham, Kam Chancellor, and Sheldon Richardson.
I will say, I used to be on the Jimmy Band wagon, but, if you don't use something, what good is it?
Probably the wisdom is that teams target him defensively, but on the other hand, say we had someone under the radar, (Willson?) that teams don't target and I bet, we can get as much productivity out of him than we and how we utilize Graham.
Kam.. Kam's been productive and has been instrumental to our D.
Sheldon..he had that int, anything else? That's not fair, I"m sure what he brings is a lot of unseen intangibles to the line.
However, I would say, before we had him, we all probably thought our D was good enough. As it is right now, our D has got to be good for a long time on the field, a long long time on the field. Now, would our Defense be more effective if they were on the field a lot less? Would our offense be more effective on the field a lot more? Yes to all, and not only that, by keeping our offense on the field, as we have witnessed in 14, 15, it just wares out the opponents defense. Do you remember those pics of opponents d all standing around, hunched over, exhausted? I do, why, cause our damn offense was on the field all the time, running them bastards into the ground setting up easy long passes, and long runs.
So yes, get rid of who you want.. anyone not named Kam, Sherman, Thomas or Wagner.