Mad Dog":xxoi6app said:I only have one reply to this thread:
Tom Coughlin
Run out of town by the Giants despite 2 rings. Game has passed him by, they said. NYG have been a crap show since. Coughlin goes onto be an advisor for the Jags. A crap show of a franchise is suddenly taking down all comers including Brady and the Pats.
This is the hell you are headed for Seahawk fans. Be careful what you wish for. (And I said the same thing about Bevell and only now the light is clicking on for some of you.)
You don't fire good coaches. You don't dump good QB's. Nothing good ever comes of it. The odds of finding superior replacements are stacked astronomically against you.
So I ask then, what happens when a coach's output doesn't match with the good coach label? Is someone always a good coach once they've hit some paydirt? Do coaches never go through slumps? Or is that all ever good coaches do, go through slumps?
To me, it seems like anyone who ever wins hardware, in your eyes, is a good coach and should never, ever, have their output measured after winning that hardware. That's weird to me.