twisted_steel2":lkg0wit6 said:
Steve2222":2ivixdbl said:Sherman wasn’t resigned because he was injured. Sherman wasn’t resigned because he clearly had a problem with the Seahawks organization and was becoming bigger than the team. Same with Bennett. These guys, though may have been loved by their teammates, were tearing apart the locker room because of their obvious disdain for how things were being run. Bennett was still publicity going after his team while still playing for them last year on the call in the Super Bowl. G** d*** get over it.
Sherman didn’t get a raw deal. He was upset on how the Seahawks ran their organization so the organization gave him his wish and told him bye.
He then goes to the 49ers, a hated rival, who were preseason NFC darlings, on a modest contract, to spite his former team. I’m glad karma got him on that one. Rotting on a 2-10 team.
rcaido":3cbg73xv said:Steve2222":3cbg73xv said:Sherman wasn’t resigned because he was injured. Sherman wasn’t resigned because he clearly had a problem with the Seahawks organization and was becoming bigger than the team. Same with Bennett. These guys, though may have been loved by their teammates, were tearing apart the locker room because of their obvious disdain for how things were being run. Bennett was still publicity going after his team while still playing for them last year on the call in the Super Bowl. G** d*** get over it.
Sherman didn’t get a raw deal. He was upset on how the Seahawks ran their organization so the organization gave him his wish and told him bye.
He then goes to the 49ers, a hated rival, who were preseason NFC darlings, on a modest contract, to spite his former team. I’m glad karma got him on that one. Rotting on a 2-10 team.
How exactly was Bennett tearing up the locker room? Are you talking about the book? As for Sherman, they didn't sign him because of money/unknown from injury...
Seahawks let go a lot of people all the time to save money...We got rid of Haush money, we even got rid of our place kicker to just save a couple thousand. Its a numbers value game for Schneider. That's why we are trading 1st round just to save salary & more value w/ second/third round picks.
Pay Sherman 8-13million who is coming off a major injury or draft up some new players in the draft?
These guys were not cancers to the locker room or they would have been shipped out a long time ago like they did with Harvin.
Popeyejones":2yf59hrc said:What Doug Baldwin said is more critical of the Seahawks -- and was much more direct about it -- than what Richard Sherman said.
Just saying.
As for what Sherman said, there's not really any bulletin board material in there.
What's happening is that in these types of game week media cross-over calls people just BS and repeat Hallmark card phrases about their opponents.
Sherman, on the other hand, didn't do that, and honestly answered the questions that were posed to him.
It only stands out because he was honest rather than repeating bumper sticker slogans, which is what everyone else does.
If you're surprised that Richard Sherman honestly answered the questions that were posed to him, I have trouble believing that you have any familiarity with Richard Sherman.
Steve2222":1nm3x1ob said:rcaido":1nm3x1ob said:Steve2222":1nm3x1ob said:Sherman wasn’t resigned because he was injured. Sherman wasn’t resigned because he clearly had a problem with the Seahawks organization and was becoming bigger than the team. Same with Bennett. These guys, though may have been loved by their teammates, were tearing apart the locker room because of their obvious disdain for how things were being run. Bennett was still publicity going after his team while still playing for them last year on the call in the Super Bowl. G** d*** get over it.
Sherman didn’t get a raw deal. He was upset on how the Seahawks ran their organization so the organization gave him his wish and told him bye.
He then goes to the 49ers, a hated rival, who were preseason NFC darlings, on a modest contract, to spite his former team. I’m glad karma got him on that one. Rotting on a 2-10 team.
How exactly was Bennett tearing up the locker room? Are you talking about the book? As for Sherman, they didn't sign him because of money/unknown from injury...
Seahawks let go a lot of people all the time to save money...We got rid of Haush money, we even got rid of our place kicker to just save a couple thousand. Its a numbers value game for Schneider. That's why we are trading 1st round just to save salary & more value w/ second/third round picks.
Pay Sherman 8-13million who is coming off a major injury or draft up some new players in the draft?
These guys were not cancers to the locker room or they would have been shipped out a long time ago like they did with Harvin.
No I’m not talking about his book or his kneeing.
Bennett was one of the players who was named on how he was blowing off Pete’s message to the team. He has also always been vocal on his displeasure of the SB49 call. Why else do you think they gave him away for a bag of peanuts? He was and still is producing at a high level. You just don’t get rid of disruptive DL because you don’t want to pay them, especially when his contract really wasn’t too bad.
Again, you guys are being incredibly naive if you don’t think some of those outspoken, core defensive players act was growing thin with Pete Carroll. The Seahawks were in much need of a culture change.
rcaido":3gd4g1na said:Steve2222":3gd4g1na said:rcaido":3gd4g1na said:Steve2222":3gd4g1na said:Sherman wasn’t resigned because he was injured. Sherman wasn’t resigned because he clearly had a problem with the Seahawks organization and was becoming bigger than the team. Same with Bennett. These guys, though may have been loved by their teammates, were tearing apart the locker room because of their obvious disdain for how things were being run. Bennett was still publicity going after his team while still playing for them last year on the call in the Super Bowl. G** d*** get over it.
Sherman didn’t get a raw deal. He was upset on how the Seahawks ran their organization so the organization gave him his wish and told him bye.
He then goes to the 49ers, a hated rival, who were preseason NFC darlings, on a modest contract, to spite his former team. I’m glad karma got him on that one. Rotting on a 2-10 team.
How exactly was Bennett tearing up the locker room? Are you talking about the book? As for Sherman, they didn't sign him because of money/unknown from injury...
Seahawks let go a lot of people all the time to save money...We got rid of Haush money, we even got rid of our place kicker to just save a couple thousand. Its a numbers value game for Schneider. That's why we are trading 1st round just to save salary & more value w/ second/third round picks.
Pay Sherman 8-13million who is coming off a major injury or draft up some new players in the draft?
These guys were not cancers to the locker room or they would have been shipped out a long time ago like they did with Harvin.
No I’m not talking about his book or his kneeing.
Bennett was one of the players who was named on how he was blowing off Pete’s message to the team. He has also always been vocal on his displeasure of the SB49 call. Why else do you think they gave him away for a bag of peanuts? He was and still is producing at a high level. You just don’t get rid of disruptive DL because you don’t want to pay them, especially when his contract really wasn’t too bad.
Again, you guys are being incredibly naive if you don’t think some of those outspoken, core defensive players act was growing thin with Pete Carroll. The Seahawks were in much need of a culture change.
Got a link, i dont recall ever reading anything about that except for the book which Carroll denies. As for Bennett again it was age/injury/money/unknown...He had couple years left in his contract. Seahawks wanted to go younger... i sure as hell didn't agree with it, one of my favs and was pissed they let him go. Also was pissed when later found out Patriots were willing to give a 3rd & 5th rounder.
knownone":1sysunrs said:I find Sherman amusing. I only wish people in the media used his rhetoric against him. It would be really hilarious to watch and he might start revoking press passes again.
Let's see what the argument against Sherman would be using his rhetoric.
Sherman was the product of Pete's system and playing with the greatest safety tandem in NFL history. It's just a fact, look at his success before Carroll and after Carroll, and look at the number of corners who've performed at a high level in Seattle. Sherman was an average corner in college. He's an average corner in San Fran.
I mean, sure, maybe Seattle won't find a guy who will come close to replacing his production in the 5th round... oh, they already did? OMG! It hasn't even been one year. You mean to tell me that since week 6 a first-year converted safety who makes 500k per year has a nearly identical average score according to PFF as a 3x All-Pro who makes 8 million. That's unfortunate...
The Seahawks probably win at least 2 Superbowls if the defense doesn't give up 14 points and allow the Patriots back into the game. Just facts, the defense had a 10 point lead in the final 10 minutes. Don't forget the game in Atlanta in 2012 where the defense allowed Atlanta to score on 5 of their first 6 drives averaging 60 yards per drive and gave up 41 yards in 21 seconds to lose the game in the final minute.
The front office really hurt this team by holding on to so many entitled veteran players with injury risks. If you just look at the veteran players we resigned and held onto the truth is the truth. Think about it, they probably make the playoffs last year if they would have traded Sherm and used that salary space to resign Hauska and sign Wentworth or another lineman in free agency. You would have at least got a 2nd round pick for Sherman and you would have saved a 2nd round pick in the process by signing Wentworth and not trading for Brown. Probably would have been better off not resigning Kam or Bennett too, respect is important but this is a business after all.
I'll be honest, I enjoy using Sherman's technique of using hindsight and warping opinions to state them as facts... It's really kind of fun.
rcaido":20poz169 said:Got a link, i dont recall ever reading anything about that except for the book which Carroll denies. As for Bennett again it was age/injury/money/unknown...He had couple years left in his contract. Seahawks wanted to go younger... i sure as hell didn't agree with it, one of my favs and was pissed they let him go. Also was pissed when later found out Patriots were willing to give a 3rd & 5th rounder.
Now he's riding the wave of despair
Sgt. Largent":3umckjty said:rcaido":3umckjty said:Got a link, i dont recall ever reading anything about that except for the book which Carroll denies. As for Bennett again it was age/injury/money/unknown...He had couple years left in his contract. Seahawks wanted to go younger... i sure as hell didn't agree with it, one of my favs and was pissed they let him go. Also was pissed when later found out Patriots were willing to give a 3rd & 5th rounder.
Carroll never denied the book thing, he just diplomatically said he never saw Bennett reading in meetings.
You know who never denied it? Sherman and Bennett.
https://www.seattletimes.com/sports/sea ... l-bennett/
It's all good. We've moved on, too bad Sherman hasn't moved on. Wish he could just be positive, but he's still taking shots. Maybe 2-3 more years playing on a 5-11 team will give him the perspective needed to mature and realize maybe he didn't have it so bad here.
But doubt it.
"Mike never brought a book to a meeting, I'll tell you that," the Seahawks' coach said Monday.
Steve2222":3454slzg said:rcaido":3454slzg said:Steve2222":3454slzg said:rcaido":3454slzg said:How exactly was Bennett tearing up the locker room? Are you talking about the book? As for Sherman, they didn't sign him because of money/unknown from injury...
Seahawks let go a lot of people all the time to save money...We got rid of Haush money, we even got rid of our place kicker to just save a couple thousand. Its a numbers value game for Schneider. That's why we are trading 1st round just to save salary & more value w/ second/third round picks.
Pay Sherman 8-13million who is coming off a major injury or draft up some new players in the draft?
These guys were not cancers to the locker room or they would have been shipped out a long time ago like they did with Harvin.
No I’m not talking about his book or his kneeing.
Bennett was one of the players who was named on how he was blowing off Pete’s message to the team. He has also always been vocal on his displeasure of the SB49 call. Why else do you think they gave him away for a bag of peanuts? He was and still is producing at a high level. You just don’t get rid of disruptive DL because you don’t want to pay them, especially when his contract really wasn’t too bad.
Again, you guys are being incredibly naive if you don’t think some of those outspoken, core defensive players act was growing thin with Pete Carroll. The Seahawks were in much need of a culture change.
Got a link, i dont recall ever reading anything about that except for the book which Carroll denies. As for Bennett again it was age/injury/money/unknown...He had couple years left in his contract. Seahawks wanted to go younger... i sure as hell didn't agree with it, one of my favs and was pissed they let him go. Also was pissed when later found out Patriots were willing to give a 3rd & 5th rounder.
Google it
Here’s a quick one though
https://www.cbssports.com/nfl/news/pete ... ected/amp/
rcaido":2o9vb44k said:Steve2222":2o9vb44k said:rcaido":2o9vb44k said:Steve2222":2o9vb44k said:No I’m not talking about his book or his kneeing.
Bennett was one of the players who was named on how he was blowing off Pete’s message to the team. He has also always been vocal on his displeasure of the SB49 call. Why else do you think they gave him away for a bag of peanuts? He was and still is producing at a high level. You just don’t get rid of disruptive DL because you don’t want to pay them, especially when his contract really wasn’t too bad.
Again, you guys are being incredibly naive if you don’t think some of those outspoken, core defensive players act was growing thin with Pete Carroll. The Seahawks were in much need of a culture change.
Got a link, i dont recall ever reading anything about that except for the book which Carroll denies. As for Bennett again it was age/injury/money/unknown...He had couple years left in his contract. Seahawks wanted to go younger... i sure as hell didn't agree with it, one of my favs and was pissed they let him go. Also was pissed when later found out Patriots were willing to give a 3rd & 5th rounder.
Google it
Here’s a quick one though
https://www.cbssports.com/nfl/news/pete ... ected/amp/
Ok....That says nothing that he was a cancer...The quoting on those seem so splice together would love to see a video on that. I've tried googling it and can't find anything that shows he was tearing up the locker room. I honestly want to see these evidence. If anything he seem to protect the QB. He even wrote a book talking how much he like Wilson.